Pushkinskaya st. 43. office 10
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
344082
e-mail: info@hjournal.ru 
tel. +7(863) 269-88-14

cubsEN (2)

Risk Oriented Audit Methodology’s Improvement, based on the Fraud Theory

Risk Oriented Audit Methodology’s Improvement, based on the Fraud Theory

Journal of Economic Regulation, , Vol. 7 (no. 4),

Modern economic development is accompanied by the increasing complexity of the relationship structure, intercompany transactions, the requirements for information disclosure on the entity’s activities. It leads to the opportunities growth of fraudulent representation public companies reporting. The external audit is considered as an institution that resists to negative processes. The issues of improving the tools that assessing the risk of material misstatement of the financial statements due to fraud from the standpoint the fraud theory have been examined here. Determining potential areas in which methodology for risk assessment of material misstatement of the financial statements due to fraud in an audit are based on the modern fraud theory interpretations will be develop. Functional and structural, comparative, logical and historical, deductive and inductive analyst methods have been used. Retrospective analysis on research areas in the fraud theory field has been performed. Perspective directions for improving methodology and methods for risk assessment of material misstatement of the financial statements in an audit have been identified. Methodology development for fraud risk assessment procedures in an audit of financial statements is based on “fraud diamond” theory. Creating new interpretations the fraud theory during last fifteen years is a consequence the expansion opportunities for corporate fraud, one of the most common species which is the financial statements falsification. Changing the list of factors that could initiate the fraud in the company's public reporting requires that the methods of its identification during the audit should be improved. Methodology and methods risk assessment of intentional material misstatement of the financial statements need to be improved in the direction both the modern modification of fraud theory.


Keywords: fraud; auditing; reliability; financial statements.

References:
  • Abdullahi R. and Mansor N. (2015а). Forensic Accounting and Fraud Risk Factors: The Influence of Fraud Diamond Theory. The American Journal of Innovative Research and Applied Sciences, vol. 1(5), pp. 186-192.
  • Abdullahi R. and Mansor N. (2015b). Fraud Triangle Theory and Fraud Diamond Theory. Understanding the Convergent and Divergent For Future Research. International Journal of Academic Research Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 38-45.
  • Albrecht S., Vents Dzh. and Uil'yams T. (1995). A ray of light on the dark side of the business. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 400 p. (In Russian).
  • Albrecht W. S., Albrecht Ch. and Albrecht C. C. (2008). Current Trends in Fraud and its Detection. Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective, no. 1. pp. 2-12.
  • Beneish M. D. (1999). The Detection of Earnings Manipulation. Financial Analysts Journal, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 24-36.
  • Bocharov A. I., Kilyachkov A. A., Kryatov S. G. et al. (2011). The study of business security risks in Russian companies. Мoscow, Publ. House of Russian Branch ACFE, 18 p. (In Russian).
  • Cressey D. R. (1954). The differential association theory and compulsive crimes. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, vol. 45, no. 1. pp. 29-40.
  • Duffield G. and Grabosky P. (2001). The psychology of fraud. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, no. 199, pp. 1-6.
  • Gbegi D. O. and Adebisi J. F. (2013). The new fraud diamond model: how can it help forensic accountants in fraud investigation in Nigeria? European Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance Research, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 129-138.
  • Irregular Payments and Withdrawal of Assets (2010). / Ed. by Dzh. T. Uells. Мoscow, Maroseika Publ., 196 p. (In Russian).
  • Ken Y. Ch. and Elder R. J. (2007). Fraud Risk Factors and the Likelihood of Fraudulent Financial Reporting: Evidence from Statement on Auditing Standards No. 43 in Taiwan. Mimeo, 36 p.
  • Kharland E., Novikova I. and Vostrova T. (2014). Russian Economic Crime Survey in 2014. On a right way. Мoscow, Pricewaterhouse Coopers Publ., 32 p. (In Russian).
  • Koletar J. W. (2003). Fraud Exposed: What You Don't Know Could Cost Your Company Millions. Wiley, 208 p.
  • Marks J. (2011). Fraud Triangle: Not Good Enough These days, IIA/ACFE Conference in Cleveland, OH, 53 p.
  • Mukhametshin R. T. (2008). Prevention frauds − the path to success. Good corporate governance. Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship, no. 10-2, pp. 71-75. (In Russian).
  • Prodanova N. A. and Lizyaeva V. V. (2013). The distortion of the financial statements as a financial instrument of abuse. Monograph. Odessa, Kuprienko SV, pp. 27-45. (In Russian).
  • Ramamoorti S., Morrison D. and Koletar J. W. (2014). Bringing Freud to Fraud: understanding the state-of-mind of the C-level suite/white collar offender through «A-B-C» analysis. Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting, no. 6(1), pp. 47-81.
  • Shargaev A. V. (2014). Perfection of the Russian legislation in the sphere of combating corporate fraud. International Research Journal, no. 11-2, pp. 101-104. (In Russian).
  • Sutherland E. H. (1983). White Collar Crime/Foreword by Donald R. Cressey. Westport, Conn., Greenwood Press, 272 p.
  • Sutherland E. and Cressey D. (1960). Principles of Criminology. NY, Philadelphia, 646 p.
  • Wolfe D. and Hermanson D. R. (2004). The fraud diamond: Considering four elements of fraud. The CPA Journal, no. 74(12), pp. 38-42.
  • Yusof M. K., Ahmad Khair A. H. and Simon J. (2015). Fraudulent Financial Reporting: An Application of Fraud Models to Malaysian Public Listed Companies. The Macrotheme Review, no. 4(3), pp. 126-145.
Publisher: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Founder: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Online ISSN: 2412-6047
ISSN: 2078-5429