.png)
Regional aspects of development of public and private spheres of creative economy (on example of higher education)
Regional aspects of development of public and private spheres of creative economy (on example of higher education)
Olga V. Barashkova
Postgraduate of the Faculty of Economics, Senior Researcher of the Faculty of Philosophy, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Postgraduate of the Faculty of Economics, Senior Researcher of the Faculty of Philosophy, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Journal of Economic Regulation,
2018, Vol.
9
(no. 2),
The article raises the question of regional aspects of differentiation in terms of the degree of
development of the creative economy and its public and private spheres in relation to such a sector
as higher education. As a spatial unit of analysis, Federal Districts and regions – subjects of the
Russian Federation were chosen. Based on the analysis of statistical data provided by Rosstat, the
author comes to the conclusion that in such a sector of the creatosphere as education, public (state)
ownership is the most significant for satisfying the needs of the population, and private property
plays the role of an additional factor that, which in a number of cases makes it possible to smooth
out the shortage caused by inadequate state participation. In particular, this manifests itself in a
greater proportion of private institutions of higher learning in those regions where the population's
availability of public institutions is lower than the national average. It is only possible to provide the
population with higher educational institutions, mainly at the expense of the private sphere, to rare
regions. In addition, the study of statistical data in the regional context confirms the conclusion of
a number of researchers of the creative economy that the public sector of the creatosphere provides
greater equality in access to creative goods. In particular, with respect to the subject of our research –
higher education, this is manifested in the fact that a significant sector of public institutions of higher
learning is the main condition for maintaining a relatively low regional differentiation in terms of
access to education, while the private higher education develops predominantly in the richest regions
and reinforces regional inequalities in this area.
Keywords:
creatosphere, private intellectual property, the public sector, the regions of Russia, education, creative economy
References:
- Buzgalin, A. V. (2017a). Creative economy: Private intellectual property or ownership by everybody of everything? Sociological Studies, no. 7, pp. 43–53. (In Russian).
- Buzgalin, A. V. (2017b). Creative economy: Why and how private intellectual property can be limited. Sociological Studies, no. 8, pp. 20–31. (In Russian).
- Dzhabborov, D. B. (2016). Progress of human qualities: market and post-market mechanisms to stimulate social and economic development. Economic Revival of Russia, no. 4, pp. 68–73. (In Russian).
- Dzhabborov, D. B. (2017). Transformation of relations of commodity production under the influence of creative work: thesis abstract. 08.00.01 “Economic theory”. Moscow, 2017. (In Russian).
- Florida, R. (2007). Creative class: people who change the future. Moscow: Klassika XXI. (In Russian).
- Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class: And How it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Perseus Book Group).
- Mamedov, O. Yu. (2015a). Ten principles of classical political-economic analysis. Questions of Political Economy, no. 1, pp. 38–47. (In Russian).
- Mamedov, O. Yu. (2015b). The methodology of modern political-economic analysis (the basics of economics and theoretical research). Questions of Political Economy, no. 2, pp. 10–13. (In Russian).
- Pilyasov, A., Kolesnikova, O. (2008). Evaluation of the creative potential of Russian regional communities. Problems of Economics, no. 9, pp. 50–69. (In Russian).
- Rosstat (2016). Regions of Russia. Socio-economic indicators. 2016: Statistical compendium. Moscow. (In Russian).
- Zamyatina, N. Yu., Pilyasov, A. N. (2013). Russia, which we found: exploring the space at the micro level. Moscow: Novyy khronograf. (In Russian).
Publisher:
Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Founder: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Online ISSN: 2412-6047
ISSN: 2078-5429
Founder: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Online ISSN: 2412-6047
ISSN: 2078-5429