Pushkinskaya st. 43. office 10
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
344082
e-mail: info@hjournal.ru 
tel. +7(863) 269-88-14

cubsEN (2)

Institutions, technologies and increasing returns

Institutions, technologies and increasing returns

Journal of Institutional studies, , Vol. 7 (no. 1),

Institutions and technologies significantly affect economic development. Nevertheless, the genesis and evolution of institutions are often treated separately from technologies. This paper attempts to underscore the fact that institutions and technologies are connected with specific rules, moreover, they guide recurrent social interactions. It is assumed that analyzing institutions and technologies together may expose the rules associated with the process of information and knowledge spillover. The phenomenon of increasing returns is considered an important characteristic of current social and technological processes. Much attention has been paid to increasing returns and lock-in effects, since ineffective or suboptimal institutions are evolutionarily selected. Innovation activity is considered in the context of institutional-technological change under conditions of increasing returns. This approach enables us to focus on the means of choice of complementary institutional and organizational structures implemented by the government in the framework of its innovation policy. The effects of the implementation of new social technologies in the realms of innovation and education have been addressed in the context of shared social values and incentive structures.


Keywords: institutions; technologies; increasing returns; institutional environment; innovations; institutional economics

References:
  • Akerlof G. A. and Shiller R. J. (2010). Animal Spirits: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism, Moscow, United Press. (In Russian).
  • Arthur B. (2005). Increasing returns and the new world of business. Economic Herald of Rostov State University, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 7-19. (In Russian).
  • Volchik V. V. (2004). Evolutionary Paradigm and institutional transformation of the economy. Rostov-on-Don, p. 318. (In Russian).
  • Volchik V. V. (2008). Postindustrial economy institutions evolution in context of Veblen’s dichotomy. Economic Herald of Rostov State University, vol. 6, no. 2. (In Russian).
  • Volchik V. V. (2009). Evolution of the Russian power-property institution. Political Conceptology, no. 1, pp. 154-178. (In Russian).
  • Volchik V. V. and Kot V. V. (2013). Institutional change in the context of economic orders modernization. Journal of Institutional Studies. vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 38-53. (In Russian).
  • Efimov V. M. (2011). Discursive economics: methodology and history of economics reconsidered. Journal of Economic Regulation, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 5-79. (In Russian).
  • Latov Y. V. (2004). Power-property in Medieval Russia. Economic Herald of Rostov State University, vol. 2, no. 4. (In Russian).
  • Malkina M. Yu., Volchik V. V. and Krivosheeva-Medyantseva D. D. (2014). The influence of institutional environment on the operation and development of national innovation systems. Journal of Economic Regulation, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 26-43. (In Russian).
  • Mikhalkina E. V. and Aleshin V. A. (2013). Effective contract as an institute of the social and labor relations in higher education. Terra Economicus, vol. 11, no. 3. pp. 89-100. (In Russian).
  • Mokyr J. (2012). The Gifts of Athena: Historical of the Knowledge Economy. Moscow, Publ. House of Gaidar Institute. (In Russian).
  • North D. (1993). Institutions and economic growth: a historical introduction. THESIS, vol. 1, Issue 2, pp. 69-91. (In Russian).
  • Olson M. (1995). The power dispersion and society in transition period. Medications from corruption, decay and economic slowdown. Economics and Mathematical Methods, vol. 31, no. 4. (In Russian).
  • Rosenberg N. and Birdzell Jr. (1995). How the West Grew Rich: The Economic Transformation of the Industrial World Paperback. Novosibirsk. (In Russian).
  • Arthur W. B. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal, no. 99, pp. 116-131.
  • Arthur W. B. (2007). The structure of invention. Research Policy, no. 36, pp. 274-287.
  • Arthur W. B. (2009). The Nature of Technology. What It Is and How It Evolves, London: Penguin Books Ltd.
  • Bush P. (1987). The Theory of Institutional Change. Journal of Economic Issues, vol. XXI, no. 3, pp. 1078-1102.
  • Commons J. R. (1931). Institutional Economics. American Economic Review, vol. 21, pp. 648-657.
  • Cowan R. (1990). Nuclear Power Reactors: A Study in Technological Lock-in. Journal of Economic History, Sep., vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 541–567.
  • David P. A. (1985). Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, vol. 75, no. 2.
  • Dequech D. (1999). Expectations and Confidence under Uncertainty. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, no. 26 (1), pp. 415-430.
  • Dequech D. (2013). Economic Institutions: explanations for conformity and room for deviation. Journal of Institutional Economics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 81-108.
  • Dosi G. (2000). Innovation, organization and economic dynamics: Selected essays. Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Greif A. (2006). Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Hodgson G. M. (2003).The hidden persuaders: institutions and individuals in economic theory. Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 159-175.
  • Hodgson G. M. (2006). “What Are Institutions?” Journal of Economic Issues, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1-25.
  • Künneke R. W., Groenewegen J. and Auger J. F. (2009). The Governance of Network Industries: Institutions, Technology and Policy in Reregulated Infrastructures, pp. 1-212.
  • Maslov A. and Volchik V. (2014). Institutions and Lagging Development: The Case of the Don Army Region. Journal of Economic Issues, 48 (3), pp. 727–742.
  • McPherson M. S. and Schapiro M. O. (1999). Tenure issues in higher education. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13 (1), pp. 85-98.
  • Mokyr J. (2000). Knowledge, Technology, and Economic Growth during the Industrial Revolution. Technology and Productivity Growth. Bart Van Ark and Gerard Kuper, eds., The Hague: Kluwert.
  • Nelson R. R. (2002). Bringing institutions into evolutionary growth theory. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, vol. 12, no 1, pp. 17-28.
  • Nelson R. R. and Winter S. G. (2002). Evolutionary Theorizing in Economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 23-46.
  • OECD (2014), Education at a Glance2014: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing.
  • Olson M. Jr. (1995). The Devolution of the Nordic and Teutonic Economies. American Economic Review, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 22–27.
Publisher: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Founder: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
ISSN: 2076-6297