Pushkinskaya st. 43. office 10
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
344082
e-mail: info@hjournal.ru 
tel. +7(863) 269-88-14

cubsEN (2)

The Institutional System of Economic Agents’ Social Responsibility

The Institutional System of Economic Agents’ Social Responsibility

Journal of Institutional studies, , Vol. 7 (no. 4),

In this paper it was made an attempt to analyse the main characteristics of the institutional system of economic agents social responsibility. The institutional system can be described as a complex of norms, rules, regulations and enforcement mechanisms in the context of interactions and communications of economic agents. The institutional nature of social responsibility allow to solve social dilemmas through the internalization of social responsibility norms and creating social value orientations, which are determine the prosocial behaviour of economic agents. The institutional system of social responsibility was described from the methodological institutionalism point of view. Analysing this phenomenon we are required to develop research on the objects of this system (norms, regulations, behaviour), on the subjects of this system (persons, business, government) and on the institutional mechanisms (internalization of social responsibility norms, promoting prosocial behaviour, adaptation and transformation of the social responsibility norms) aimed to ensure the understanding of origin and significance of social responsibility for modern society.


Keywords: institutional system; social responsibility; institutional mechanism; social dilemmas

References:
  • Acemoglu D., Johnson S. and Robinson J. (2006). Institutions as the Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth. Ecovest. vol. 5. no. 1. pp. 4-43. (In Russian).
  • Bator F. (2003). The anatomy of market failure. The Milestones of Economic Thought. Volume 4. Welfare Economics and Public Choice. Moscow, School of Economics Publ., pp. 251-292. (In Russian).
  • Berezhnoy I. V. (2008). Institutional Determinants of the Economic Order. TERRA ECONOMICUS, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 88-94. (In Russian).
  • Bogomolov O. T. (2008). Economics and social environment. Unconscious interference. Scientific Notes and Essays. Moscow, Institute for Economic Strategies Publ. (In Russian).
  • Bogaert S. (2008). Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A review and conceptual model / S. Bogaert, C. Boone, C. Declerck. British Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 47, рp. 453–480.
  • Bowles S. (2010). Microeconomics: behavior, institutions, and evolution. Moscow, Business [Delo] Publ. (In Russian).
  • Bowles S. and Polania-Reyes S. (2013). Economic Incentives and Social Preferences: Substitutes or Complements? Voprosy Ekonomiki, vol. 4, pp. 24-48. (In Russian).
  • Etzioni A. (1999). The new golden rule. The New Postindustrial Wave on the West. Moscow, Academia Publ. (In Russian).
  • Frolov D. P. (2013) The institutional complexity of corporate social responsibility (nature, institutions, mechanism). Journal of Institutional Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 124-144. (In Russian).
  • Gak G. M. (1981) The selected papers. Ed. by A. A. Baller, L. N. Moskvichev. Moscow, Thought [Mysl[ Pub. (In Russian).
  • Granovetter M. (2009). The Strength of Weak Ties. Journal of Economic Sociology, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 49-79. (In Russian).
  • Hodgson G. (2003). The hidden persuaders: institutions and individuals in economic theory. TERRA ECONOMICUS, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 11-30. (In Russian).
  • Karpuhin S. V. (2000). Social responsibility of the person as a philosophical problem. Dr.of Sciences Thesis. (In Russian).
  • Klyamkin I. M. (2013). No alternative to the past and some alternatives at present. Moscow, "Liberal Mission" Fond Publ. (In Russian).
  • Kollock P. (1998). Social Dilemmas: The Anatomy of Cooperation. Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 24, рp. 183-214.
  • Kurbatova M. (2013). Methodological alternatives of economic "mainstream". Comparative characteristics. Social Studies and the Modernity, vol. 5, pp. 76-89. (In Russian).
  • Kurbatova M. V. (2010). Post-industrial economy institutional environment formation problems in modern Russia. Journal of Institutional Studies, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 54-66. (In Russian).
  • Kuzminov J. I, Radaev V. V. and Yakovlev A. A. (2005) The institutions from borrowing to growing. Modernization of Economy and Nurturing of Institutions. vol. 1. High School of Economics Publ. pp. 7-64. (In Russian).
  • Melnik D. (2013). Does the economic theory need ethics? Looking from the Aristotelian tradition view. Social Studies and the Modernity, vol. 5, pp. 5-15. (In Russian).
  • Minkina N. A. (1990) Parenting responsibility. Moscow, Higher School Publ. (In Russian).
  • North D. (2011). Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Moscow, Institute of Gaidar Publ. (In Russian).
  • North D. (2012). In the shadow of violence: lessons for societies with limitedaccess to political and economic activities. Moscow, High School of Economics Publ. (In Russian).
  • Orekhovskiy A. I. (1998) Grounds of Responsibility: methodological and praxeological aspects. Novosibirsk, SibSUTI Publ. (In Russian).
  • Ostrom E. (2010). Governing the commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Moscow, IRISEN Publ. (In Russian).
  • Pliskevich N. M. (2009). Social Inequality in the Conditions of Neo-Etacratic. Social Studies and the Modernity, vol. 6, pp. 68-81. (In Russian).
  • Polishchuk L. (2009), Corporate Social Responsibility VS Government Regulation: an Analysis of Institutional Choice. Voprosy Ekonomiki, vol. 10,. pp. 4-22. (In Russian).
  • Portrait of a Social Entrepreneur: Key Characteristics. The Final Report of the Study. Moscow, Zircon Publ., 2013. (In Russian).
  • Ridley M. (2013). The Origins of Virtue. Moscow, Exmo Publ. (In Russian).
  • Sen A. (1996). About Ethics and Economics. Moscow, Science [Nauka] Publ. (In Russian).
  • The Introduction to Institutional Economics (2005). Ed. by Lvov D. Moscow, Economics Publ. (In Russian).
  • Vakhtina M. A. (2011) Trust the State as an Important Factor of Increasing its Efficiency. Journal of Institutional Studies, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 57-65. (In Russian).
  • Vishnevskiy V. and Dementyev V. (2009). Innovation, Institutions and Evolution. Voprosy Ekonomiki, vol. 9, pp. 41-62. (In Russian).
  • Voigt S. (2013). How (not) to Measure Institutions. Journal of Institutional Economics, vol. 9, рp. 1-26.
  • Volchik V. and Kot V. (2013). Institutional Change in Context of Economic Orders Modernization. Journal of Institutional Studies, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 36-57. (In Russian).
  • Volchik V. V. and Zotova T. A. (2010). Economic Behavior in the Context of Institutional Evolution. TERRA ECONOMICUS, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 62-67. (In Russian).
Publisher: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Founder: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Online ISSN: 2412-6039
ISSN: 2076-6297