Pushkinskaya st. 43. office 10
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
344082
e-mail: info@hjournal.ru 
tel. +7(863) 269-88-14

cubsEN (2)

Institutional Problems and Development Perspectives Innovative Entrepreneurship in Resource Economics

Institutional Problems and Development Perspectives Innovative Entrepreneurship in Resource Economics

Journal of Institutional studies, , Vol. 7 (no. 4),

The paper justifies the necessity to transit towards the mobilization model "triple helix" (strategic partnership of science and education organizations, business and government, the public). Innovation as a product of entrepreneurship permeate the system of relations from top to bottom – from more efficient ways of doing home Ho households, and to design mechanisms of state regulation of the economy. However, at the theoretical level, the relationship remains poorly studied in-novations as a function of entrepreneurship and entrepreneurship as social phenomenon in the system of institutional relations "business-authorities-society". Modern Russian economy has features of "dual enclave economy" with isolated more productive export-oriented resource sector. Innovative entrepreneurs do not become actors of change because of weak protection of property rights, manipulated state, weak sanctions for rent-seeking. The transition from innovative system "technology push" (fundamental knowledge on demand of state) towards innovation system "market pull" (innovations on demand of business) is complicated within Y-matrix of competitive institutional environment. It could turn out to be more effective to transit to the mobilization model "triple helix" (strategic partnership of science and education organizations, business and government, the public) in compliance with X-matrix of cooperative institutional environment of redistribution. This will allow to create the necessary mechanisms for the exchange of missing codified knowledge (for those who imitate innovations) and tacit knowledge (for pure innovators) in the cross-sectoral technological chains. The design of institutional change in compliance with real needs of participants of innovative processes requires formal analysis of the region economic development type through assessing its key spheres, revealing and modeling prevailing type of entrepreneurship as well as identifying the relationship between development type and entrepreneurship type within institutional environment.


Keywords: entrepreneurship; dual enclave economy; innovation; institutions; routines; institutional matrices

References:
  • Amoros J. E. and Bosma N. (2014). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2013 Global Report. (http://www.gemconsortium.org/docs/3106/gem-2013-global-report - Access Date: 12.10.2015).
  • Bonnet J. and Cussy P. (2010). High education, sunk costs and Entrepreneurship. The Entrepreneurial Society. How to Fill the Gap Between Knowledge and Innovation, pp. 37-53.
  • Brusoni S., Cefis E. and Orsenigo L. (2006). Innovate or Die? A critical review of the literature on innovation and performance. – KITeS Working Papers 179. Milano. P. 14. (http://ftp://ftp.unibocconi.it/pub/RePEc/cri/papers/WP179BrusoniCefisOrsenigo.pdf - Access Date: 25.10.2015).
  • Castellacci F. (2010). Structural change and the growth of industrial sectors: Empirical test of a GPT model. Review of Income and Wealth, vol. 56, issue 3, pp. 449–482.
  • Clark B. R. (2011). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Directions of Transformation. Moscow, Publ. House of State University Higher School of Economics. (In Russian).
  • Kirdina S. G. (2014). Institutional Matrices Theory, or X&Y Theory: the Main Provisions and Applications. Journal of Institutional Studies, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 15-33.
  • Krueger A. (1974). The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society. American Economic Review, no 64 (3), pp. 291–303.
  • Lundvall B.-A. (2007). A Study of Innovation Systems: their origins and possible perspectives. Materials for Conference Globelics-Russia-2007. Saratov, pp. 17-40. (In Russian).
  • Malerba F. and Orsenigo L. (1993). Technological Regimes and Firm Behavior. Industrial and Corporate Change, no. 2, pp. 45-74.
  • March D. D. (2005). Search Activity and Operation of Proven Techniques in Organizational Learning. Russian Management Journal, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 147-168. (In Russian).
  • North D., Wallis D. and Weingast B. (2011). Violence and social orders. The Conceptual Framework for the Interpretation of the Written History of Mankind. Moscow, Publ. House of Gaidar Institute. (In Russian).
  • Polterovich V. (2007). Elements of the Theory of Reform. M.: Publishing House Economics. (In Russian).
  • Rutskiy V. N., Pyzhev I. S. and Ferova I. S. (2013). Institutional Characteristics of Innovative Entrepreneur and Approaches to its Studying in Modern Russia. Post-Soviet Institutionalism: 10 Years Later. Eds. V. V. Demetyev, R. M. Nureev, vol. 2. Donetsk, State HEI DonNTU. (In Russian).
  • Schumpeter Y. (2007). The Theory of Economic Development. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Moscow, Eksmo Publ. (In Russian).
  • Stiglitz J. E. (2002). Towards a New Paradigm for Development: Strategies,Policies and Processes. Columbia University Academic Commons. (http://hdl.handle.net/10022/AC:P:19637 - Access Date: 22.09.2015).
  • Ter Wal A. L. J. and Boschma, R. (2011). Co-evolution of firms, industries and networks in space. Regional Studies, vol. 45, issue 7, pp. 919-933.
  • Volchkova N. and Suslova E. (2008). Human Capital, Industrial Growth and Resource Curse. Economic Journal of HSE, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 217-238. (In Russian).
  • Volchik V. V. and Kot V. V. (2013). Institutional change in the context of economic orders modernization. Journal of Institutional Studies, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 38-53. (In Russian).
  • Volchik V. V. and Krivosheeva-Medyantseva D. D. (2015). Institutions, Technologies and Increasing Returns. Journal of Institutional Studies, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 45-58. (In Russian).
  • Yudanov A. (2012). What is an Innovative company? Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 7, pp. 30-46. (In Russian).
Publisher: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Founder: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Online ISSN: 2412-6039
ISSN: 2076-6297