Pushkinskaya st. 43. office 10
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
e-mail: info@hjournal.ru 
tel. +7(863) 269-88-14

cubsEN (2)

Adaptive Rationality, Adaptive Behavior and Institutions

Adaptive Rationality, Adaptive Behavior and Institutions

Journal of Institutional studies, , Vol. 7 (no. 4),

The economic literature focused on understanding decision-making and choice processes reveals a vast collection of approaches to human rationality. Theorists’ attention has moved from absolutely rational, utility-maximizing individuals to boundedly rational and adaptive ones. A number of economists have criticized the concepts of adaptive rationality and adaptive behavior. One of the recent trends in the economic literature is to consider humans irrational. This paper offers an approach which examines adaptive behavior in the context of existing institutions and constantly changing institutional environment. It is assumed that adaptive behavior is a process of evolutionary adjustment to fundamental uncertainty. We emphasize the importance of actors’ engagement in trial and error learning, since if they are involved in this process, they obtain experience and are able to adapt to existing and new institutions. The paper aims at identifying relevant institutions, adaptive mechanisms, informal working rules and practices that influence actors’ behavior in the field of Higher Education in Russia (Rostov Region education services market has been taken as an example). The paper emphasizes the application of qualitative interpretative methods (interviews and discourse analysis) in examining actors’ behavior.

Keywords: adaptive rationality; adaptive behavior; bounded rationality; institutions; education

  • Akerlof G. and Kranton R. (2010). Identity Economics: How Our Identities Shape Our Work, Wages, and Well-Being. Moscow, Career Press. (In Russian).
  • Akerlof G. and Shiller R. (2010). Animal Spirits: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism. Moscow, United Press. (In Russian).
  • Ariely D. (2013). Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces that Shape Our Decisions. Moscow, Mann, Ivanov and Ferber. (In Russian).
  • Arthur B. (2003). Inductive reasoning and bounded rationality. Economic bulletin of Rostov State University, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 53-61. (In Russian).
  • Arthur W. B. (2013). Complexity Economics. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Coase R. (2007). The Firm, the Market and the Law. Moscow, New Publishing House [Novoe Izdatelstvo]. (In Russian).
  • Commons J. (2012). Institutional economics. TERRA ECONOMICUS, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 69-76. (In Russian).
  • Elster Yu. (2014). Explaining social behavior: one more time about the essentials of social sciences. The Issues of Philosophy, no. 11, pp. 163-173. (In Russian).
  • Gigerenzer G. and Goldstein D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 650-659.
  • Haselton M. G. et al. (2009). Adaptive rationality: An evolutionary perspective on cognitive bias. Social Cognition, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 733-763.
  • Hayek F. A. Individualism and Economic Order. Moscow, Society [Sotsium]. (In Russian).
  • Huber J., Payne J. W. and Puto C. (1982). Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: Violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 9 (1), pp. 90-98.
  • Kahneman D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow, New York, Farrar, Straus andGiroux.
  • Kahneman D., Slovic P. and Tversky A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York, Cambridge University Press.
  • Koumakhov R. (2009). Conventions in Herbert Simon’s theory of bounded rationality. Journal of Economic Psychology, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 293-306.
  • Krugman P., Wells R. and Olney M. (2011). Essentials of Economics. St. Petersburg, Peter Publ. (In Russian).
  • Lea A. M. and Ryan M. J. (2015). Irrationality in mate choice revealed by túngara frogs. Science, vol. 349, no. 6251, pp. 964-966.
  • Lefevr V. A. (1973). Conflicting structures. Moscow, Soviet Radio. (In Russian).
  • March J. G. and Simon H. A. (1958/1953). Organizations (2nd ed.), Cambridge, Basil Blackwell.
  • McCloskey D. N. (2010). Bourgeois dignity: Why economics can't explain the modern world, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  • Nelson R. R. (2008). Bounded rationality, cognitive maps, and trial and error learning. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 78-89.
  • North D. (2010). Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Moscow, Publ. House of State University Higher School of Economics. (In Russian).
  • Pinker S. (2005). So how does the mind work?. Mind and Language, vol. 20, pp. 1-24.
  • Polonioli A. (2015a). Adaptive Rationality, Biases, and the Heterogeneity Hypothesis. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, pp. 1-17.
  • Polonioli A. (2015b). Stanovich's arguments against the “adaptive rationality” project: An assessment. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, vol. 49, pp. 55-62.
  • Simon H. A. (1993). Rationality as Process and as Product of Thought. THESIS, issue 3, pp. 16-38. (In Russian).
  • Stein E. (1996). Without Good Reason: The Rationality Debate in Philosophy and Cognitive Science: The Rationality Debate in Philosophy and Cognitive Science, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Stevens J. R. (2008). The evolutionary biology of decision making. In Better than conscious? Ernst Strüngmann Forum Report 1, ed. C. Engel and W. Singer, Cambridge, MIT Press.
  • Tambovtsev V. L. (2013). Methodological analysis and the development of economic science. Social Sciences and the Present, no. 4, pp. 42-53. (In Russian).
  • Todd P. M. and Gigerenzer G. (2003). Bounding rationality to the world. Journal of Economic Psychology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 143-165.
  • Tversky A. and Kahneman D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, vol. 185, no. 4157, pp. 1124-1131.
  • Tversky A. and Kahneman D. (1981).The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, vol. 211, no. 4481, pp. 453-458.
  • Tversky A. and Kahneman D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, pp. S251-S278.
  • Volchik V. V. (2004). Neutral markets, non-neutral institutions and economic evolution. TERRA ECONOMICUS, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 55-68. (In Russian).
  • Volchik V. V. and Zotova Т. А. (2011) Adaptive rationality and economic behavior in evolutionary context. TERRA ECONOMICUS, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 54-64. (In Russian).
  • Williamson O. E. (1993) Behavioral Assumptions of Modern Economic Analysis. THESIS, issue 3, pp. 39-49. (In Russian).
  • Zafirovski M. (2013). Beneath rational choice: Elements of “irrational choice theory”. Current Sociology, vol. 61(1), pp. 3–21.
  • Zaostrovtsev A. P. (2014). Economists about history: Deirdre McCloskey’s concept. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 12, pp. 129-146. (In Russian).
Publisher: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Founder: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Online ISSN: 2412-6039
ISSN: 2076-6297