Pushkinskaya st. 43. office 10
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
e-mail: info@hjournal.ru 
tel. +7(863) 269-88-14

cubsEN (2)

"Capital" by K. Marx vs. "The Development of Capitalism in Russia" by V. I. Lenin: Similarities and Differences

"Capital" by K. Marx vs. "The Development of Capitalism in Russia" by V. I. Lenin: Similarities and Differences

Journal of Institutional Studies, , Vol. 10 (no. 1),

The article is devoted to studying the works of Karl Marx in Imperial Russia. Examines the background and reasons for the rapid spread of Marxism in the country, the second echelon of capitalism. The publication of the works of Marx extended for 100 years, and understanding began only at the end of the period of socialism. The insensitive perception of Marx's economic heritage, the absolutization of separate published works at different periods of development, their analysis in isolation from other works of the founder of Marxism led to a certain simplification and vulgarization of his views in the social-democratic literature of the late XIX-early XX century. The work of the Russian Marxists was no exception. An important feature of Russian economic thought was that it perceived the advanced achievements of its Western counterparts in conditions of catching up development. Hence the desire not only (and often not so much) to set out the main questions of the theory, how much to try to apply them to Russian reality. Particular attention is paid in the article to the analysis of V.I. Lenin's works, his role as a popularizer and vulgarizer of Marx is shown, factors that contribute to the Russification and orientation of Marxism are investigated. The spread of Marxism in the Russian Empire "breadth" occurred to a much greater extent than is allowed domestic economic, social and cultural conditions. But the same Russian reality has become obstacle to the spread of Marxism in Russia, "depth", for its development in an integrated and adequate primary source form. In conclusion, analyzes the causes of increasing interest to the academic Marxism, both in our country and abroad.

Keywords: historical school, Marxism, the genesis of capitalism, the catching-up development

  • Bagaturiya, G. A. and Vygodsky, V. S. (1976). Economic legacy of Karl Marx (history, content, methodology). М. (In Russian).
  • Ilyenkov, E. V. (1960). The dialectic of the abstract and concrete in Marx’s Capital. Moscow, Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences. (In Russian).
  • Khessin, N. V. (1968). V. I. Lenin on the essence and the main features of commodity production. Moscow: Moscow State University. (In Russian).
  • Kogan, A. M. (1983). In the creative laboratory of Karl Marx. М. (In Russian).
  • Kuz’min, V. P. (1976). The principle of systematicity in Marx’s theory and methodology. М. (In Russian).
  • Lenin, V. I. Complete Works. Vol. 1–55. (In Russian).
  • Luxemburg, R. (1934). Accumulation of capital. M, L. (In Russian).
  • Marx, K. and Engels, F. Works. 2nd ed. Vol. 1–50. (In Russian).
  • Nureev, R. M. (1983). K. Marx on the basic forms of production relations and personal development. Voprosy filosofii, 5. (In Russian).
  • Nureev, R. M. (2007). The historical fate of the teachings of Karl Marx. Voprosy ekonomiki, 7, 73–85. (In Russian).
  • Nureev, R. M. (2013). Russia: the pros and cons of the early spread of the ideas of Marxism in breadth. Journal of Institutional Studies, 5(3), 8–51. (In Russian).
  • Nureev, R. M. (1999). The development of capitalism in Russia: the first Leninist step from schematism to reality (returning to the printed one). In the book: The Development of Capitalism in Russia – 100 Years Later. Moscow – Volgograd. (In Russian).
  • Pashkov, A. I. (1960). Economic work of V. I. Lenin in the 90s. М. (In Russian).
  • Plekhanov, G. V. (1956–1958). Selected philosophical works. In 5 volumes. M. (In Russian).
  • Rosenberg, Nathan (1974). Karl Marx on the Economic Role of Science. Journal of Political Economy, 82.
  • Rosenthal, M. M. (1967). Dialectics of Capital of Karl Marx. M.: Mysl’. (In Russian).
  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1995). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. M., Ekonomika. (In Russian).
  • Shkredov, V. P. (1973). The method of property research in K. Marx’s Capital. M.: Izd-vo MGU. (In Russian).
  • Smirnov, I. K. (1984). The method of studying the economic movement of capitalism in Marx’s Capital. L, Publishing House of Leningrad State University. (In Russian).
  • The history of Marxist dialectics. From the emergence of Marxism to the Leninist stage. (1971) M, Mysl’. (In Russian).
  • The initial version of “Capital” (Economic manuscripts of Marx in 1857–1859). (1987) М. (In Russian).
  • The ratio of the two divisions of social production (1983). 2 ed. М. (In Russian).Tsvaynert, Y. (2007). History of economic thought in Russia 1805–1905 gg. Moscow: SUHSE. (In Russian).
  • Tugan-Baranovsky, M. I. (1894). Industrial crises in modern England, their causes and influence on people’s lives. St. Petersburg. (In Russian).
  • Tugan-Baranovsky, M. I. (1898). Russian factory in the past and present. Historical and economic research. T. I. Historical development of the Russian factory in the XIX century. St. Petersburg. (In Russian).
  • Tugan-Baranovsky, M. I. (1899). The main mistake of Marx’s abstract theory of capitalism. Nauchnoye obozreniye, 5. (In Russian).
  • Tugan-Baranovsky, M. I. (1901). Studien zur Theorie und Geschichte der Handelskrisen in England.
  • Tugan-Baranovsky, M. I. (1998а). Fundamentals of political economy. Moscow, ROSSPEN. (In Russian).
  • Two divisions of social production (1971). М. (In Russian).
  • Vasilyulin, V. A. (1968). The logic of Marx’s “Capital”. М, Moscow State University. (In Russian).
  • Vygodsky, V. S. (1970). To the history of the creation of “Capital”. М. (In Russian).
  • Vygodsky, V. S. (1975). Economic justification of the theory of scientific communism. M. (In Russian).
  • World History of Economic Thought: 6 t. (1988–1989) vol. 2, 3. М. (In Russian).
Publisher: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Founder: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Online-ISSN: 2412-6039
ISSN: 2076-6297