Pushkinskaya st. 43. office 10
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
344082
e-mail: info@hjournal.ru 
tel. +7(863) 269-88-14

cubsEN (2)

Devil's Advocate for Werewolf in Epaulets: What Kind of Lawyers Defend Misconducted Law Enforcers in Russian Courts?

Devil's Advocate for Werewolf in Epaulets: What Kind of Lawyers Defend Misconducted Law Enforcers in Russian Courts?

Journal of Institutional Studies, , Vol. 10 (no. 2),

If the rule of law does not prevail, certain privileged groups gain an advantage in court. Recent studies have shown that law enforcers in Russia are one of the social groups, which, being be explained in different ways, including their special status and loyalty of the judges. Without rejecting these possible reasons, we assume that law enforcement officers, having a unique experience within the law enforcement system, are able to choose for themselves more effective criminal attorneys. Based on a survey of 3,317 attorneys, we show the difference of ethics and effectiveness of lawyers who have or do not have the experience of protecting law enforcers and judges. Attorneys of law enforcers often had working experience in the law enforcement system. Such lawyers achieve more significant results in conditions of "accusatory bias". In addition, they more often record violations of the rights of defendants, more often achieve positive results for their clients. Finally, the defenders of law enforcers are often "devil's advocates" as they declare their willingness to protect the interests of people who enjoy the reputation of mafia.


Keywords: law enforcement system; violation of defendant’s rights; professional ethics

References:
  • Auzan, A. (2015). Path Dependence Problem: The Evolution of Approaches. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 6: Economics, 1, 3–17 (in Russian).
  • Belianin, A., Kosals, L. (2015). Collusion and Corruption: an Experimental Study of Russian Police. Working Paper WP9.
  • Berdysheva, E. (2013). “Brotherhood from the stick”: the system of assessing the law enforcement bodies APPG + 1 as a threat to the unity of the professional community of Russian policemen. In the book. Professionals in the era of reforms: the dynamics of ideology, status and values: Collective monograph. Moscow: Institute of Sociology, RAS. 111–130. (in Russian).
  • Berdysheva, E. (2016). Varying Worth of Crimes in the Eyes of Policemen in Russia. Journal of Economic Sociology, 17(4), 15–52. (in Russian).
  • Bocharov, T., Moiseeva, E. (2017). To be a lawyer in Russia: a sociological study of the profession. SPb.: Publishing house of the European University in St. Petersburg. (in Russian).
  • Chatsverykova, I. (2016). Severity and leniency in criminal sentencing in Russia: the effects of gender and family ties. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, vol. 0, no. 0, 1–25. doi:10.1080/01924036.2016.1228073
  • Drake, L. M., Simper, R. (2005). Police Efficiency in Offences Cleared: An Analysis of English “Basic Command Units”. International Review of Law and Economics, 25(2), 186–208. doi:10.1016/j.irle.2005.06.003
  • Eterno, J. A., Verma, A., Silverman, E. B. (2016). Police Manipulations of Crime Reporting: Insiders’ Revelations. Justice Quarterly, 33(5), 811–835. doi:10.1080/07418825.2014.980838
  • Firestone, T. (2008). Criminal Corporate Raiding in Russia. The International Lawyer, 42(4), 1207–1229.
  • Gerber, M. M., Jackson, J. (2016). Justifying violence: legitimacy, ideology and public support for police use of force. Psychology, Crime & Law, 23(1), 79–95. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2016.1220556
  • Gerber, T. P., Mendelson, S. E. (2008). Public Experiences of Police Violence and Corruption in Contemporary Russia: A Case of Predatory Policing? Law & Society Review, 42(1), 1–44. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5893.2008.00333.x
  • Hendley, K. (2009). “Telephone Law” and the “Rule of Law”: The Russian Case. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 1(2), 241–262. doi:10.1017/S1876404509002413
  • Hendley, K. (2013). Puzzling Non-Consequences of Societal Distrust of Courts: Explaining the Use of Russian Courts. The Cornell International Law Journal, 45, 517.
  • Jordan, P. A. (2005). Defending rights in Russia: Lawyers, the state, and legal reform in the post-Soviet era. Cambridge Univ. Press. (http://journals.cambridge.org/production/action/cjoGetFulltext?fulltextid=1439056).
  • Kazun, A. P, Khodzhaeva, E. A., Yakovlev, A. A. (2015). Advocate community of Russia. Moscow: IPP EU SPb. (in Russian).
  • Kazun, A. P., Yakovlev, A. A. (2015). Advocacy community and the quality of law enforcement in Russia. Economic Policy, 10(4), 7–37. (in Russian).
  • Kazun, A. (2015). Violent Corporate Raiding in Russia: Preconditions and Protective Factors. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, 23(4), 459–484.
  • Khodzhaeva, E. & Rabovsky, Y. (2015). Strategies and tactics of lawyers in the context of accusatory bias in Russia. Sociology of power, 2, 135–167. (in Russian).
  • Ledeneva, A. (2008). Telephone Justice in Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs, 24(4), 324–350. doi:10.2747/1060-586X.24.4.324
  • Levine, K. (2016). How We Prosecute the Police. The Georgian Law Journal, 104(4), 745–776.
  • Markus, S. (2015). Property, Predation, and Protection: Piranha Capitalism in Russia and Ukraine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • North, D., Wallis J, Weingast B. (2009). Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Osipian, A. (2012). Predatory raiding in Russia: Institutions and property rights after the crisis. Journal of Economic Issues, 46(2), 469–479. doi:10.2753/JEI0021-3624460222
  • Paneyakh, E. L., Titaev, K. D, Volkov, V. V., Primakov, D. Y. (2010). The indictment in the criminal trial: the prosecutor’s factor. SPb: IPP EU SPb. (in Russian).
  • Paneyakh, E. (2014). Faking performance together: systems of performance evaluation in Russian enforcement agencies and production of bias and privilege. Post-Soviet Affairs, 30(2–3), 115–136. doi:10.1080/1060586X.2013.858525
  • Parker, C., Evans, A. (2007). Inside Lawyers’ Ethics (1st edition.). Cambridge England; New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rhode, D. L. (2004). Access to Justice. Oxford University Press.
  • Rochlitz, M. (2014). Corporate raiding and the role of the state in Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs, 30(2–3), 89–114. doi:10.1080/1060586X.2013.856573
  • Shklyaruk, M. S. (2014). Legal statistics: the system conflict between knowledge of crime and the account of departmental work of St. Petersburg: Institute for Law Enforcement at the European University in St. Petersburg, 27. (in Russian).
  • Slade, G., Light, M., Kosals, L., Maksimova, A. (2015). Informality, crime and corruption in Russia: A review of recent literature. Theoretical Criminology, 19(2), 278–288. doi:10.1177/1362480615581099
  • Spohn, C. C. (2008). How Do Judges Decide? The Search for Fairness and Justice in Punishment (2nd edition.). Los Angeles u.a.: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • Tavris, C. & Aronson, E. (2008). Mistakes Were Made (but Not by Me): Why We Justify Foolish Beliefs, Bad Decisions and Hurtful Acts. London: Pinter & Martin Ltd.
  • Taylor, B. D. (2014). Police reform in Russia: the policy process in a hybrid regime. Post-Soviet Affairs, 30(2–3), 226–255. doi:10.1080/1060586X.2013.860752
  • Titaev, K. D. (2012). Cunning cops. Why failed all projects to improve law enforcement in Russia. Sociology of power, 4–5, 96–110. (in Russian).
  • Titaev, K. D. (2014). Pretrial Detention in Russian Criminal Justice: Sociological Analysis of the Probability of Pretrial Detention and its Influence on Court Decisions. Journal of Economic Sociology, 15(3), 88–118. (in Russian).
  • Volkov, V. V. (ed.). (2012). How judges make decisions: empirical research is right. M.: Statute. (in Russian).
  • Volkov, V. (2016). Legal and Extralegal Origins of Sentencing Disparities: Evidence from Russia’s Criminal Courts. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 13(4), 637–665. doi:10.1111/jels.12128
  • Volkov, V. & Dmitryieva, A. (2015). Recruitment patterns, gender, and professional subcultures of the judiciary in Russia. International Journal of the Legal Profession, 22(2), 166–192. doi:10.1080/09695958.2015.1086351
  • Volkov, V., Dmitrieva, A., Pozdnyakov, M., Titaev, K. (2016). Russian judges: a sociological study of the profession. M.: Norm. (in Russian).
  • Volkov, V. V. (2014). Influence of the defendant’s social status on the court decision. Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, XVII(4), 62–85. (in Russian).
  • Wu, T.-H., Chen, M.-S., Yeh, J.-Y. (2010). Measuring the performance of police forces in Taiwan using data envelopment analysis. Evaluation and Program Planning, 33(3), 246–254. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.09.001
  • Yakovlev, A., Sobolev, A., Kazun, A. (2014). Means of production versus means of coercion: can Russian business limit the violence of a predatory state? Post-Soviet Affairs, 30(2–3), 171–194. doi:10.1080/1060586X.2013.859434
  • Yakovlev, A. (2016). What is Russia trying to defend? Russian Journal of Economics, 2(2), 146–161.
Publisher: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Founder: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Online-ISSN: 2412-6039
ISSN: 2076-6297