Pushkinskaya st. 43. office 10
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
344082
e-mail: info@hjournal.ru 
tel. +7(863) 269-88-14

cubsEN (2)

Claude Menard’s Meso-Institution Theory and It’s Application in the Institutional Design

Claude Menard’s Meso-Institution Theory and It’s Application in the Institutional Design

Journal of Institutional Studies, , Vol. 10 (no. 3),

As the analysis of the publication activity of economists shows, despite the aversion from a significant part of the economic mainstream representatives, the idea of the need to allocate the meso level of the economy finds more and more supporters among the heterodox lines of economic thought, primarily among evolutionists and institutionalists. The article shows that the meso-level interpretation, which is relatively popular among the latter, as a space for the formation of institutions, can be extended beyond the limits of theoretical institutionalism. Claude Menard's theory of the meso-institutions as organizational structures of an intermediate level can be an example. It is noted that the theory of meso-institutions shifts the traditional view of meso-economists from consideration of upward processes of institutionalization of rules and informal norms towards consideration of top-down processes of introducing and adapting formal institutional norms developed at the macro level into a complex institutional environment. Moreover, meso-institutions can be considered as backbone structures on which the oncoming descending and ascending movement of formal and informal norms is integrated, which determines their significance in the processes of designing strategies for institutional transformations. Are shown the prospects of using the theory of meso-institutions of Claude Menard for such areas as institutional design and reform theory.


Keywords: meso level; mesoeconomics; institutionalism; institutions; meso-institutions; game theory; reforms; reform theory

References:
  • Alexander, E. R. (2006). Institutional Design for Sustainable Development. The Town Planning Review, 77(1).
  • Aligica, P. and Boettke, P. (2009). Challenging Institutional Analysis and Development: The Bloomington School London. New York: Routledge.
  • Chen, P. (2008). Equilibrium illusion economic complexity and evolutionary foundation in economic analysis. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 5(1), 81–127.
  • Dopfer, K. and Potts, J. (2010). Why evolutionary realism underpins evolutionary economic analysis and theory: A reply to Runde’s critique. Journal of Institutional Economics, 6(3), 401–413.
  • Dopfer, K., Foster, J. and Potts, J. (2004). Micro–meso–macro. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(3), 263–279
  • Elsner, W. (2009). The process and a simple logic of ‘meso’. Emergence and the coevolutionof institutions and group size. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. June 2010, 20(3), 445–477.
  • Elsner, W. and Heinrich, T. (2009). A simple theory of ‘meso’. On the co-evolution of institutions and platform size – With an application to varieties of capitalism and ‘mediumsized’countries. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38, 843–858.
  • Hess, Ch. and Ostrom, E. (2003). Ideas, Artifacts, and Facilities: Information as a Common-Pool Resource. Law and Contemporary Problems, 66, 1 1/2, 111–145.
  • Kirdina-Chandler, S. (2017). The Meso Level: A New Look in Economics? Working paper. M.: Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 36 р.
  • Kirdina-Chandler, S. G. and Maevskii, V. I. (2017). Methodological issues of the mesolevel analysis in economics. Journal of Institutional Studies, 9 (3), 7–23. (In Russian).
  • Klijn, E. and Koppenjan, J. (2006). Institutional design: Changing institutional features of networks. Public Management Review, 8(1), 141–160.
  • Kruglova, M. (2017). Mesoeconomic theory in English-scientific literature. Journal of Institutional Studies, 9(3), 24–35. (In Russian).
  • Laffont, J. J. (2005). Regulation and Development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Menard, C. (2018). Research Frontiers in New Institutional Economics. Revista de Administração. Management Journal, 53(1), 3–10
  • Menard, C., Jimenez, A. and Tropp, H. (2018). Addressing the policy-implementation gaps in water services: the key role of meso-institutions. Water International, 43(1), 13–33.
  • Menard, C. (2014). Embedding organizational arrangements: towards a general model. Journal of Institutional Economics, 10(4), 567–589.
  • North, D. C. (1992). Institutions and Economic Theory. The American Economist, 36(1), 3–6.
  • OECD (2011). Water Governance in OECD countries: A Multi-Level Approach, OECD studies on Water, Paris: OECD. (http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/watergovernance-in-oecd-countries_9789264119284-en - Access Date: 18.08.2018)
  • Ostrom, E. (2014). Do institutions for collective action evolve? Journal of Bioeconomics, 16(1), 3–30.
  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press.
  • Ribot, J. C., Agrawal, A. and Larson, A.M. (2006). Recentralizing while decentralizing: how national governments reappropriate forest resources. World Development, 34 (11), 1864–1886
  • Rodgers, Y. and Cooley, J. (1999). Outstanding Female Economists in the Analysis and Practice of Development Economics. World Development, 27(8), 1397–1411.
  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1954). History of economic analysis. Oxford University Press.
  • Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and Organizations. London.
  • Stewart, F. (1992). Can Adjustment Programmes Incorporate the Interests of Women? Afshar and Dennis, 13–45.
  • UNESCO (2006). The United Nations World Water Development Report 2: Water, a Shared Responsibility. Paris: UNESCO. (http://www.unesco.org/bpi/wwap/s/ – Access Date: 18.08.2018)
  • Volynskii, A. (2017). Mesolevel as object of research in the scientific economic literature of contemporary Russia. Journal of Institutional Studies, 9(3), 36–49. (In Russian).
Publisher: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Founder: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Online-ISSN: 2412-6039
ISSN: 2076-6297