Pushkinskaya st. 43. office 10
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
344082
e-mail: info@hjournal.ru 
tel. +7(863) 269-88-14

cubsEN (2)

Transaction Costs in the Public Procurement in Russia: Macrolevel Assessment Based on Microdata

Transaction Costs in the Public Procurement in Russia: Macrolevel Assessment Based on Microdata

Journal of Institutional Studies, , Vol. 10 (no. 3),

Cost accounting in public procurement is an essential element in optimizing the procurement process for an individual enterprise as well as in evaluating the procurement regulation system at the state level. Today, however, insufficient attention is paid to this issue in Russian and foreign studies. There is limited literature devoted to assessment of costs at the level of individual enterprises or projects. Only several foreign studies estimated the costs of public procurement at the macro level (country or regional). No such macro level assessment has been carried out in Russia so far. This paper, based on a mass-scale online survey of customers and suppliers conducted in 2017, is the first attempt to estimate the average costs of public procurement in Russia, including the average costs for each type of procurement procedure. According to our estimates, the total cost of public procurement in Russia was about 64 billion rubles in 2016, or about 1% of the total contracted amount for that year. Using regression analysis, we also investigated the impact of various factors on the cost value of public procurements – the size of the respondent's organization (number of employees), the scope of activity, the number of staff involved in public procurement, the region, the qualifications/work experience of the employee, gender differences. The most significant factor influencing costs assessment of procurement procedures is the respondent's experience with complex competitive procedures.


Keywords: public procurement; transaction costs; customers; suppliers

References:
  • Arrow, K. J. (1969). The organization of economic activity: Issues pertinent to the choice of market versus nonmarket allocation. The analysis and evaluation of public expenditure: The PPB system (Vol. 1). U.S. Joint Economic Committee, 91st Congress,
  • 1st Session, 59–73.
  • Balaeva, O. N., Korobeinikova, L. S., Chupandina, E. E., Yakovlev, A. A. (2014). Assessing the cost of the customer in the Russian system of public procurement (the Voronezh State University case). University Management: Practice and Analysis, 2(90), 54–69. (In Russian).
  • Büchner, S., Freytag, A., González, L. G., Güth, W. (2008). Bribery and public procurement: an experimental study. Public Choice, 137(1–2), 103–117.
  • Coase, R. H. (1988). The firm, the market and the law. Chicago, University of Chicago press, 217 p.
  • Costantino, N., Dotoli, M., Falagario, M., Fanti, M. P., Iacobellis, G. (2009). A decision support system framework for purchasing management in supply chains, special issue on purchasing orientation. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 24(3/4), 278–290.
  • Costantino, N., Dotoli, M., Falagario, M., Fanti, M. P., Iacobellis, G. (2006). Evaluating the total cost of purchasing via probabilistic and fuzzy reasoning. Fuzzy Economic Review, 11(1), 69–92.
  • Costantino, N., Dotoli, M., Falagario, M., Sciancalepore, F. (2012). Balancing the additional costs of purchasing and the vendor set dimension to reduce public procurement costs. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 18(3), 189–198.
  • Dufek, L. et al. (2013). Measuring private transaction costs of public procurement: Case of the Czech Republic. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 61(2), 317–325.
  • Eggertsson, T. (1990). Economic Behavior and Institutions. Cambridge.
  • Groth, M. (2008). Private Ex-Ante Transaction Costs for Repeated Biodiversity Conservation Auctions: A Case Study. Working Paper Series in Economics, 84, May, University of Lüneburg.
  • Labaznova, E. V., Krasilnikova, E. V. (2009). Optimization of transaction costs as a mechanism for increasing the efficiency of order placing. State Order: management, placement, provision, 21, 52–63. (In Russian).
  • Laffont, J.-J., Tirole, J. (1991). Auction design and favoritism. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 9(1), 9–42.
  • Milgrom, P. R., Roberts, J. (1992). Economics, organization, and management. N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
  • Moszoro, M. W., Spiller, P. T. (2012). Third-Party Opportunism and the Nature of Public Contracts, Working Paper № 18636, National Bureau of Economic Research. (http://www.nber.org/papers/w18636 – Access Date: 25.07.2018).
  • Moszoro, M., Spiller, P. T., Stolorz, S. (2016). Rigidity of Public Contracts. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 13(3), 396–427.
  • North, D. C. (1991). Institutions, ideology, and economic performance. Cato Journal, 11(3), 477–488.
  • PwC (2011). Public Procurement in Europe: cost and effectiveness. PricewaterhouseCoopers. A Study on Procurement Regulation Prepared for the European Commission. Report on the results of monitoring the implementation of Federal Law №. 44-FZ of April 5, 2013 «On the Contract System in State and Municipal Procurement of Goods, Works and Services» for 2016. (In Russian).
  • Shastitko, A. E. (1997). Transactional costs (content, estimation and interconnection with transformational problems. Voprosy Economiki, 7, 65–76. (In Russian).
  • Singer, M., Konstantinidis, G., Roubik, E., Beffermann, E. (2009). Does e-procurement save the state money? Journal of Public Procurement, 9(1), 58–76.
  • Volchik, V. V., Nechaev, A. D. (2014). Theoretical aspects to identification of transactional costs. Journal of Economic Regulation, 5(1), 26–37. (In Russian).
  • Volchik, V. V., Nechaev, A. D. (2015). Transaction analysis the scope of public procurement. Rostov-on-Don: Publ. house «Assistance-XXI century». (In Russian).
  • Wallis, J. J., North, D. C. (1988). Measuring the Transaction Sector in the American Economy, 1870–1970. Long-Term Factors in American Economic Growth. Studies in Income and Wealth. № 51 /S.L. Engerman, R.E. Gallman (eds.). Chicago; L., University of Chicago Press, 95–61.
  • Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. N.Y.: The Free Press.
  • Yakovlev, А. A., Alliluyeva, O. G., Kuznetsova, I. V., Shamrin, A. T., Yudkevich, M. M., Yakobson, L. I. (2010). The system of public procurements in Russia: road toward a new quality. Voprosy Economiki, 6, 88–107. (In Russian).
  • Yakovlev, A. A., Balaeva, O. N., Tkachenko, A. V. (2016). Estimation of procurement costs of the Russian regional public customer: the case study of Kaluga region. ECO, 1, 153–169. (In Russian).
Publisher: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Founder: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Online-ISSN: 2412-6039
ISSN: 2076-6297