Pushkinskaya st. 43. office 10
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
344082
e-mail: info@hjournal.ru 
tel. +7(863) 269-88-14

cubsEN (2)

Methodical Ware of Evaluate the Economic Efficiency Institutional Changes in the Markets

Methodical Ware of Evaluate the Economic Efficiency Institutional Changes in the Markets

Journal of Institutional Studies, , Vol. 10 (no. 3),

The article includes the solution of the question of methodical ware institutional changes research relating to different markets. Relying on the former suggested theoretical approach and the relevant modelling the article describes a set of techniques developed by the authors, designed for practical assessment of the economic efficiency of institutional changes in the markets. The complex consists of four interrelated methods: the boundary market delimitation; the allocation of market economic subjects and the description of the institutional environment of the market; the signification of institutional changes on the market; the analysis of institutional changes and calculation of their efficiency in the market; the decision making on rising of institutional change efficiency. A key pillar of the methodology for determining of the market boundaries, the allocation of economic subjects of the market and the description of the institutional environment of the market is a logical scheme of signification of institutional changes subjects. As part of the methodology of institutional changes signification, a shaping circuit of a new institutional environment of the market is developed, a sequence of changes entering in the functional institution is formed, and then the influence of changes in the components of the functional institution on the subject of activity and institutional changes is determined. The method of institutional change analysis and calculation of their efficiency consists of the relevant circuit and an evaluation method. The decision-making method for the efficiency rising of institutional changes proposes the decision-making circuit, which is applicable, both at the stage of designing and discussion of the new Institute, and at the stage of its implementation and operation.


Keywords: institutions; institutional environment; institutional changes; assessment of the economic efficiency; markets; market boundaries; economic subjects; evaluation methods

References:
  • Alas, R. (2015). Resistance to institutional and organizational change: An individual perspective. Change Management and the Human Factor: Advances, Challenges and Contradictions in Organizational Development, 153–165.
  • Ambrosino, A., Fontana, M., Gigante, A. A. (2018). Shifting Boundaries in Economics: The Institutional Cognitive Strand and the Future of Institutional Economics. Journal of Economic Surveys, 32(3), 767–791.
  • Bakir, C., Jarvis, D.S.L. (2018). Institutional and Policy Change: Meta-theory and Method. Institutional Entrepreneurship and Policy Change: Theoretical and Empirical Explorations. Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy, pp. 1–38.
  • Dabrowska, E., Zweynert, J. (2015). Economic Ideas and Institutional Change: The Case of the Russian Stabilization Fund. New political economy, 20(4), 518–544.
  • Drachuk, M. A. (2016). The role of professional standards in building a modern normative model of the labor market. Trudovoe pravo v Rossii i za rubezhom, 3, 50–53. (In Russian).
  • Elsner, W. (2017). The institutionalist theory of institutional change revisited: the institutional dichotomy in a more formal perspective. Journal of institutional studies, 9(2), 6–17.
  • Evenhuis, E. (2017). Institutional change in cities and regions: A path dependency approach. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. 10(3), 509–526.
  • Investigation of institutional changes in the UK housing market using structural break tests and time-varying parameter models (2017). Empirical Economics, 53(2), 617–640.
  • Jones, E. C. (2003). Building on Ostrom′s The Rudiments of a Theory of the Origins, Survival and Performance of Common-Property Institutions. Journal of Ecological Anthropology, 7(1), 65–72.
  • Kirdina, S. G. (2013). To a rethinking of the principle of methodological individualism. Moscow: Institut ehkonomiki RAN, 54 с. (In Russian).
  • Kirdina, S. G., Rubinshtejn, A. A., Shatalova, T. Y. (2012). Initiators, spheres of regulation and the timing of the adoption of Russian laws in 1994–2011. Electronic database. Moscow: Centr ehvolyucionnoj ehkonomiki. (In Russian).
  • Kuchar, P. (2016). Entrepreneurship and institutional change: The case of surrogate motherhood. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 26(2), 349–379.
  • Miranda, L. D., Calmon, P. C. (2018). Institutional Change Through Institutionalization: Combining Different Approaches / Institutional Entrepreneurship and Policy Change: Theoretical and Empirical Explorations. Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy, 63–84.
  • Nort, D. (1997). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Moscow: Nachala, p. 68. (In Russian).
  • Ostrom, E. (1986). An Agenda for the Study of Institutions. Public Choice, 48, 3–25.
  • Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems. American Economic Review, 100(3), 641–72.
  • Poteete, A. R., Janssen, M. A., Ostrom, E. (2010). Pushing the Frontiers of the Theory of Collective Action and the Commons / Working together: collective action, the commons, and multiple methods in practice. Princeton Univ Press, 215–346.
  • Pyzhev, I. S., Goryachev, V. P. (2018). Implementation of the theoretical approach to evaluate the economic efficiency of the institutional change in the industry market. Terra economicus, 16(2), 99–113. (In Russian).
  • Pyzhev, I. S., Rutskiy, V. N. (2018). Formation of Productive Innovative Entrepreneurship in Conditions of Limited Access Order on the Example of Russian «Resource-Type» Regions. Journal of Institutional Studies, 10(1), 125–136. (In Russian).
  • Rajzberg, B. A., Lozovskij, L. Sh., Starodubceva, E. B. (1999). Modern Economic Dictionary. Edition 2, corrected. Moscow: INFRA-M. (In Russian)
  • Roggero, M., Bisaro, A., Villamayor-Tomas, S. (2018). Institutions in the climate adaptation literature: a systematic literature review through the lens of the Institutional Analysis and Development framework. Journal of Institutional Economics, 14(3), 423–448.
  • Rutskiy, V. N., Pyzhev, I. S. (2015). Institutional problems and development perspectives of innovative entrepreneurship in resource economics. Journal of Institutional Studies, 7(4), 128–137. (In Russian).
  • Shastitko, A. E. (2010). The new institutional economic theory (55–62). Edition 4, revised and enlarged. Moscow: TEIS, 828 p. (In Russian).
  • Siu, R. C. S. (2018). Institutional Change and the Evolution of the World Leisure Industries. Journal of Economic Issues, 52(2), 378–386.
  • Tambovtsev, V. L. (1997). Theoretical issues of institutional design. Voprosy ehkonomiki, 3, 82–94. (In Russian).
  • Tambovtsev, V. L. (2004). On the variety of forms of description of institutions. ONS: Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost′, 2, 107–118. (In Russian).
  • Tambovtsev, V. L. (2014). Methods of economic analysis of law in the design of normative legal acts. Rossijskij zhurnal pravovyh issledovanij, 4(1), 101–107. (In Russian).
  • Tambovtsev, V. L. (2017). The economic theory of informal institutions: Monograph (18–122). Moscow: Prospekt, 176 p. (In Russian).
  • Volchik, V. V. (2012). Institutional changes: towards a general theory. Journal of Institutional Studies, 4(4), 4–6. (In Russian).
  • Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism – Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York: Free Press.
  • Williamson, O. E. (2000). The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38, 595–613.
  • Williamson, O. E. (2011). Corporate Governance: A Contractual and Organizational Perspective / Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance: The Contribution of Economic Theory and Related Disciplines. Palgrave, Houndmills, Basingstoke, England, 3–32.
Publisher: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Founder: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Online-ISSN: 2412-6039
ISSN: 2076-6297