Pushkinskaya st. 43. office 10
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
344082
e-mail: info@hjournal.ru 
tel. +7(863) 269-88-14

cubsEN (2)

Institutional Factors Influencing Political Trust in Modern Russia

Institutional Factors Influencing Political Trust in Modern Russia

Journal of Institutional Studies, , Vol. 12 (no. 4),

The aim of this study is to analyze and assess the impact of institutional factors on political trust in various levels of government (federal, regional and local) in modern Russia. Data and methods. The study is based on microdata from the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) “Life in Transition Survey” (LiTS). We examined such institutional factors of political trust as perceived government performance and level of corruption, as well as the level of interpersonal trust. The subjective decile of household wealth was an additional explanatory variable in our analysis. We estimated the model parameters using linear regressions with instrumental variables. Results and their application. First, we found that in 2016 the perceived effectiveness of the federal government was the main determinant of Russian trust in the president. At the same time, the perceived level of local corruption was a major factor of Russian citizens’ (mis)trust in local authorities. Second, we found that poor households turned out to be the most loyal groups of the population towards the Russian president, and we explained this phenomenon by the active redistributive policy of the federal authorities. Third, we revealed a significant positive relationship between political and interpersonal trust at the micro level. In conclusion, we made recommendations on the effective management of political trust in modern Russia.


Keywords: political trust; levels of authority; institutional factors; perceived level of corruption; government effectiveness; interpersonal trust; subjective decile of wealth

References:
  • Ananyev, M., Guriev, S. (2017). Effect of income on trust: evidence from the 2009 economic crisis in Russia. The Economic Journal, 129 (April), 1082–1118.
  • Avdeeva, D. A. (2019). Trust in Russia and its connection with the level of economic development. Social Sciences and Contemporary World, 3, 79–93. (In Russian.)
  • Baniamin, H. M. (2019). Linking socio-economic performance, quality of governance, and trust in the civil service: does culture intercede in the perceived relationships? Evidence from and beyond Bangladesh, Nepal and Sri Lanka. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 41(3), 127–141.
  • Braun, D., Fatke, M. (2019). A Palliative for Those Who Feel Left Behind? Political Trust in the Face of Economic Inequality. Available at SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2920988
  • Davyborets E. N. (2016). «Phenomenon» of trust to Russia’s president. Sociological Studies, 11, 107–113. (In Russian.)
  • Dodsworth, S., Cheeseman, N. (2020). Political trust: The glue that keeps democracies together. International Development Department, University of Birmingham, London. (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341670477_Political_trust_The_glue_that_keeps_democracies_together – Accessed: 15.09.2020).
  • Fairbrother, M., Martin, I. W. (2013). Does inequality erode social trust? Results from multilevel models of US states and counties. Social Science Research, 42 (2), 347–360.
  • Festenstein, M. (2020). Political Trust, Commitment and Responsiveness. Political Studies, 68(2), 446–462.
  • Frye, T., Gehlbach, S., Marquardt, K. L., Reuter, O. J. (2016). Is Putin’s popularity real? Post-Soviet Affairs, 33(1), 1–15.
  • Fukuyama, F. (1999). The trust. In Inozemtsev V.L. (ed.). New postindustrial wave in the West. Anthology. Moscow: Academia, 123–162. (In Russian.)
  • Goubin, S. (2020). Economic inequality, perceived responsiveness and political trust. Acta Politica, 55, 267–304.
  • Hutcheson, D. S., Petersson, B. (2016). Shortcut to Legitimacy: Popularity in Putin’s Russia. Europe-Asia Studies, 68(7), 1107–1126.
  • Kiselev, V. O. (2014). Trust in Russian political institutions: sociological monitoring case study. Monitoring public opinion: economic and social changes, 6(124), 51–63. (In Russian.)
  • Kozyreva, P. M., Smirnov, A. I. (2015). Political Trust in Russia: Peculiarities and Problem of Optimality. Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology (Vestnik Instituta sotziologii), 1(12), 79–99. (In Russian.)
  • Latov, Y. V. (2019). Corruption in the mirror of Russian public opinion: problems, contradictions, paradoxes. Journal of Institutional Studies, 11(4), 40–60. (In Russian.)
  • Lee, D., Chang, C. Y., Hur, H. (2020). Economic performance, income inequality and political trust: new evidence from a cross-national study of 14 Asian countries. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 42(2), 66–88.
  • Levi, M., Stoker, L. (2000). Political Trust and Trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3(1), 475–507.
  • Li, L. (2016). Reassessing Trust in the Central Government: Evidence from five national surveys. The China Quarterly, 225 (3), 100–121.
  • Medve-Bálint, G., Boda, Z. (2014). The poorer you are, the more you trust? The effect of inequality and income on institutional trust in East-Central Europe. Sociologicky časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 50(3), 419–453.
  • Mishler, W., Rose, R. (2001). What Are the Origins of Political Trust? Testing Institutional and Cultural Theories in Post-communist Societies. Comparative Political Studies, 34(1), 30–62.
  • Rothstein, B. (2011). The quality of government: Corruption, social trust, and inequality in international perspective. University of Chicago Press. 304 p.
  • Segovia Arancibia, C. (2008). Political trust in Latin America, Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan. 187 p.
  • Seligmen, A. B. (1997). The problem of trust. NJ: Princeton University Press. 231 p.
  • Terin, D. F. (2018). The structure of political trust in Russia: performance and fairness of political institution. Sociological journal, 24(2), 90–109. (In Russian.)
  • Uslaner, E. M. (2011). Corruption, the inequality trap and trust in government. In S. Zmerli & M. Hooghe (Eds.), Political trust: Why context matters. ECPR Press, 141 –162.
  • Wang, C.-H. (2016). Government Performance, Corruption, and Political Trust in East Asia. Social Science Quarterly, 97(2), 211–231.
  • Wu, С., Wilkes, R. (2017). Local-national political trust patterns: Why China is an exception. International Political Science Review, 39(4), 1–19.
  • Zmerli, S., Castillo, J. C. (2015). Income inequality, distributive fairness and political trust in Latin America. Social Science Research, 52, 179–192.
  • Zubarevich, N. V. (2017). Development of the Russian Space: Barriers and Opportunities for Regional Policy. The world of new economy, 2, 46–57. (In Russian.)
Publisher: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Founder: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Online-ISSN: 2412-6039
ISSN: 2076-6297