Pushkinskaya st. 43. office 10
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
344082
e-mail: info@hjournal.ru 
tel. +7(863) 269-88-14

cubsEN (2)

Employment Insecurity and Behavioral Preferences of University Graduates

Employment Insecurity and Behavioral Preferences of University Graduates

Journal of Institutional Studies, , Vol. 12 (no. 4),

This paper deals with the employment insecurity in the context of labor market dysfunction and changing institutional structure of the economy. We consider the actorsʼ behavior in the labor market as affected by the institutional factors. Employment insecurity and associated precarity processes are essenstial for young people entering the labor market. Qualitative methodology allowed us to identify the behavioral preferences of the informants through the in-depth interviews. We have conducted and analyzed 17 in-depth interviews with the university graduates. The research findings showed that the graduates are generally aware of the problems associated with unstable employment in the Russian labor market. They are relatively loyal to informal employment during university studies and for the initial few years after graduation. We focus on the graduates’ perception of the precarization processes in the context of the labor marketʼs structural opportunities. The gap between educational and economic policies and the emergence of institutions that create sustainable rules for the professional and personal development of the employees is an important cause of youth unemployment. The behavioral strategies of university graduates are associated with three main groups of factors: the existing institutional constraints on the labor market, adaptation to the demand structure in the region (city) in its competence area, and the level of competence of the graduate and his/her self-assessment of these competencies and their relevance to employersʼ modern requirements. The challenges of precarious employment are addressed by graduates in the context of competition and the need to improve their skills.


Keywords: higher education; precariat; labor market; informal employment, university graduates; behavioral preferences; institutional economics

References:
  • Анисимов, Р. И. (2017). Труд в эпоху неопределенности. Социологические исследования, (11), 44–52. DOI: 10.7868/S013216251711006X
  • Вольчик, В. В. (2016). Культура, поведенческие паттерны и индуктивное мышление // Journal of Institutional Studies (Журнал институциональных исследований), 8(4), 28–39. DOI: 10.17835/2076-6297.2016.8.4.028-039/
  • Ефимов, В. М. (2007). Предмет и метод интерпретативной институциональной экономики // Вопросы экономики, (8), 49–67.
  • Пинк, Д. (2005). Нация свободных агентов. Как новые независимые работники меняют жизнь Америки. М.: Секрет фирмы.
  • Поланьи, К. (2002). Великая трансформация. Политические и экономические истоки нашего времени. СПб.: Алетейя.
  • Тихонова, Н. Е. (2019). Прекариат и перспективы изменения социальной структуры российского общества // Социологические исследования, 2(2), 167–173. DOI: 10.31857/s013216250004023-8
  • Тощенко, Ж. Т. (2018). Прекариат: от протокласса к новому классу. ФГУП Академический научно-издательский, производственно-полиграфический и книгораспространительский центр «Наука». С. 81–85.
  • Ширяев, И. М. (2017). Подходы к идентификации институтов в институциональной экономике // Journal of Institutional Studies (Журнал институциональных исследований), 9(1), 105–116. DOI: 10.17835/2076-6297.2017.9.1.105-11.
  • Alexandrov, Y. I., Krylov, A. K., Arutyunova, K. R. (2017). Activity during learning and the nonlinear differentiation of experience // Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 21(4), 391–406.
  • Bessant, J. (2018). Young precariat and a new work order? A case for historical sociology // Journal of Youth Studies, 21(6), 780–798. DOI 10.1080/13676261.2017.1420762
  • Chan, J., Nair, M., & Rhomberg, C. (2019). Precarization and labor resistance: Canada, the USA, India and China // Critical Sociology, 45(4-5), 469–483.
  • D’Orlando, F., Ferrante, F., & Ruiu, G. (2011). Culturally based beliefs and labor market institutions // Journal of Socio-Economics, 40(2), 150–162. DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2010.12.010
  • Ferguson, N. (2014). The great degeneration: How institutions decay and economies die. Penguin.
  • Gasiukova, E., & Korotaev, S. (2019). Precarity in Russia: attitudes, work and life experience of young adults with higher education // International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 39(7/8), 506–520.
  • Greenstein, J. (2020). The Precariat Class Structure and Income Inequality Among US Workers: 1980–2018 // Review of Radical Political Economics, 52(3), 447–469.
  • Herod, A. (2016). Neoliberalism, precarious work and remaking the geography of global capitalism. Neoliberal Capitalism and Precarious Work, pp. 1–36. Available at. DOI 10.4337/9781781954959.00007
  • Hodgson, G. M. (2003). The hidden persuaders: institutions and individuals in economic theory // Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27(2), 159–175. DOI: 10.1093/cje/27.2.159
  • Kalleberg, A. L., & Vallas, S. P. (2018). Probing precarious work: Theory, research, and politics // Research in the Sociology of Work, 31(1), 1–30.
  • Kreshpaj, B., Orellana, C., Burström, B., Davis, L., Hemmingsson, T., Johansson, G., Bodin, T. (2020). What is precarious employment? A systematic review of definitions and operationalizations from quantitative and qualitative studies // Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 46(3), 235–247. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3875
  • Mokyr, J. (2016). A Culture of Growth. Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt1wf4dft
  • North, D. C. (1989). Institutions and economic growth: An historical introduction // World Development, 17(9), 1319–1332. DOI: 10.1016/0305-750X(89)90075-2
  • Rudakov, V., Figueiredo, H., Teixeira, P. N., Roshchin, S. (2019). The Impact of Horizontal Job-Education Mismatches on the Earnings of Recent University Graduates in Russia, IZA DiscussionPapers, № 12407, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Bonn.
  • Soto De, H. (1989). The Other Path. Harper and Row Publishers Inc., New York.
  • Standing, G. (2011). The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Styhre, A. (2017). Introduction: The New World of Precarious Professional Work. Precarious Professional Work, 1–41. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-59566-5_1
  • Volchik, V., Maslyukova, E., Strielkowski, W. (2020). Spatial effects of informal employment and precarization in urban centres and regions // Theoretical & Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 15(4), 21–37.
  • Zubarevich, N. (2015). Four Russias and a new political reality. Russia’s Changing Economic and Political Regimes: The Putin Years and Afterwards.
Publisher: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Founder: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Online-ISSN: 2412-6039
ISSN: 2076-6297