Pushkinskaya st. 43. office 10
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
344082
e-mail: info@hjournal.ru 
tel. +7(863) 269-88-14

cubsEN (2)

Thinking about capitalism, innovation and dynamics in Post-Soviet Russia

Thinking about capitalism, innovation and dynamics in Post-Soviet Russia

Journal of Institutional studies, , Vol. 6 (no.4),
p. 32-50

The paper is the extended critique of Kornai’s «theory of propensity to innovate» and contains hypothesis explaining why the Post-Soviet Russian economic system is non-innovative. Authors show that proposed by Kornai opposition «innovative capitalism/non-innovative socialism» is far-fetched. Contrary to Kornai, we can find innovative achievements in the Soviet socialist system as well as in the mixed capitalist systems with elements of socialism, in particular, with (indicative) centralized planning (China, India). Just the reverse, emerged in contemporary Russia economic system of «family-clannish capitalism» discourages agents’ incentives to the account of their decisions’ longterm consequences. The Russian households and firms underestimate their future and suffer from «investor myopia». Acted as the opponents to Kornai and based on the principle of historicism the authors emphasize the problem of specific place of Russia in the international division of scientific labor. They suppose that benefits from cooperation in the development activity should offset cost of specialization in the research work. The main ideas of the paper are confirmed by the large quantity of empirical stuff.


Keywords: innovation; creative destruction; capitalism; family-clannish capitalism; economy of Russia

References:
  • Gubina M. A. (2013). The impact of WTO accession on the pharmaceutical industry: the Indian experience, the possible consequences for Russia WTO Membership - A New Stage of Russia's Participation in the International Trading System Ed. by S. F. Sutyrin and N. A. Lomagin. Saint-Petersburg, Publ. House of Faculty of Economics, St. Petersburg State University. (In Russian).
  • Zinov V. G. (2003). Management of intellectual property. Moscow, Case [Delo] Publ. (In Russian).
  • Ilyin M. and Segal E. (1989). Alexander Porfir’evich Borodin. 1833-1887. Moscow, True [Pravda] Publ. (In Russian).
  • Indicators of Innovation Activity 2013. (2013). (http://www.hse.ru/primarydata/ii2013). (In Russian).
  • Keynes J. M. (2002). The general theory of employment, interest and money. Moscow, Helios ARV Publ. (In Russian).
  • Kovalev Yu. Yu. (2002). Geography of world science. Moscow, Gardariki Publ. (In Russian).
  • Kommersant (2009). 1 September. (http://www.kommersant.ru/pda/kommersant.html?id=1229521). (In Russian).
  • Kornai J. (1990). The path to a free economy. Moscow, Economics [Economika] Publ. (In Russian).
  • Kornai J. (2012). Reflections on capitalism. Moscow, Publ. House of Gaidar Institute. (In Russian).
  • Kudrov V. M. (2012). Modernization and innovations - main motive powers of modern progress. Contemporary Europe, no. 3, pp. 65-76. (In Russian).
  • Kudrov V. M. (2014). Between the past and the future: Russia needs a modern and effective model of development. Contemporary Europe, no. 1 (57), pp. 26-39. (In Russian).
  • Kurakova N. G., Zinov V. G., Kupriyanova O. I. and Sorokina A. V. (2014). The influence of large industrial companies on the sector of generating fundamental knowledge (Part 1). Innovations, no. 7, pp. 99-104. (In Russian).
  • Malyarov O. V. (2010). Independent India: the evolution of the social-economic models and economic development: in 2 books. Moscow, Publ. House Eastern Literature. (In Russian).
  • Medovnikov D. and Oganesyan T. (2014). Innovative dao in China. Expert, no. 45 (922). (http://expert.ru/expert/2014/45/innovatsionnoe-dao-podnebesnoj/). (In Russian).
  • Mechanik A. (2014). She went on to Landau. Expert, no. 22 (901), pp. 42-48. (In Russian).
  • Oleinik A. N. (2000). Institutional economics: A teaching aid. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ. (In Russian).
  • Ramazanov J. S. (2010). An innovative model of economy and problems of its formation in Russia. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University, vol. 317, no. 6, pp. 9­12. (In Russian).
  • Rozmainsky I. V. (2004). Main characteristics of family-clan capitalism in Russia on the boundary of centuries: institutional and postkeynesian approach. Economic Herald of Rostov State University, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 59-71. (In Russian).
  • Rozmainsky I. V. (2009). Uncertainty and institutional evolution in complexeconomic systems: The Post Keynesian approach. VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, no. 6, pp. 48 -59. (In Russian).
  • Rozmainsky I. V. (2014). Hedonistic culture and global crisis. TERRA ECONOMICUS, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 28-40. (In Russian).
  • Roland J. (2007). Economics of transition. Moscow, Publ. House of HSE. (In Russian).
  • Ryazanov V. T.(2012). A little sun in cold water crisis. Review of: Janos Kornai. Reflections on capitalism. Moscow, Publ. House of Gaidar Institute; Logos, 348 p., no. 4 (88), pp. 286-291. (In Russian).
  • Samsonov Yu. (2006). Innovation market in Russia. Ecology and Life. (http://www.center-inno.ru/materials/library/06-2). (In Russian).
  • Skorobogatov A. S. (2009). Russia's special institutional conditions for inducinginnovative activity.innovative activity. VOPROSY ECONOMIKI,no. 2, pp. 119-131. (In Russian).
  • Skorobogatov A. S. (2010). Russian “special way” in stimulating creative activity. Journal of Institutional Studies, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 96-108. (In Russian).
  • Fedotov K. A. (2005). Investment breakthrough. (http://www.contrtv.ru/print/1809/). (In Russian).
  • Figovsky O. (2012). Innovation sphere in Russia and abroad. (http://park.futurerussia.ru/extranet/blogs/figovsk/235/)(In Russian).
Publisher: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2076-6297