Pushkinskaya st. 43. office 10
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
e-mail: info@hjournal.ru 
tel. +7(863) 269-88-14

cubsEN (2)

Taxes, and the teaching of Jesus

Taxes, and the teaching of Jesus

Journal of Institutional studies, , Vol. 6 (no. 2),
p. 43-57

Despite sporadic claims to the contrary, no single economic teaching can assert doctrinal status within Christianity in its historical evolution. This pluralism of Christian theology is rooted in differing economic perspectives of Jesus; he developed distinct attitudes in relation to the environments he confronted. Those environments and perspectives are recoverable by attending both to the social archaeology of Jesus’ period and place and to the sources (oral at the outset) that fed into the emergence of the written Gospels.
Nazareth engaged in a hybrid economy involving both traditional exchange and collective trade. In that environment, Jesus portrayed the kingdom of God in terms of wealth. The source known as “Q” reflects this background, and Jesus’ perspective involves the enjoyment of what only trade can produce but means of what only the local economy of exchange can distribute and consume. The communal meal typified Jesus’ activity at this stage.
But the source called “Q” also reflects Jesus’ period in Capernaum, where he attacked the tendency of economies based on currency to produce or exacerbate poverty. Jesus’ response is not only to speak of consolation of the poor, but also to urge his followers to become poor voluntarily in the interests of those in want. This is the root of the commutarian community of disciples in Jerusalem shortly after the resurrection. The principal source for this perspective was the apostle Peter.
Opponents who wished to portray Jesus as a rebel against Rome pressed the specific issue of taxation in argument with him in Jerusalem. But Jesus’ response is not to compromise. His teaching to render what is Caesar’s to Caesar and what is God’s to God has been misunderstood as a prevarication. The teaching about what is God’s and what is Caesar’s assumes that, just as the Roman coin bears the image of the empire, so God’s kingdom makes itself evident with its own stamp. Understanding that Caesar’s power is limited to what Caesar can do - mint coins in this case - sets the boundary of political authority in comparison with humanity’s fundamental connection to God.
Jesus’ position explains why, for him, the right question about taxing is not who should pay, but - what should be taxed? And the answer is: mammon, a term whose meaning is consistent with its Aramaic background, as indicating a bribe.
Although Jesus cannot reasonably be understood to have held any economic theory, his principles regarding money and its limits suggest that policies of taxation in most developed contrives are invasive. If money is taxed instead of people, and the issue of profit (whose definition has become increasingly inscrutable) is set aside, then a flat tax on transactions of all kinds appears far more just. The fact that technology offers the prospect of effecting such a tax offers the prospect of a containment of one of the worst aspects of globalization and a just theory of taxation.

Keywords: Capernaum; imago Dei; Jerusalem; Jesus; Gospel sources; John Milton; Nazareth; social archaeology of first century Palestine; tax policy

  • Beltlyon J. W. (1992). Coinage. The Anchor Bible Dictionary. / Ed. by D. N. Freedman. New York, Doubleday, pp. 1076-1089.
  • Chilton B. Inclusion and noninclusion: The practice of the Kingdom in formative Christianity. / Religion and the Political Order, pp. 133-172.
  • Chilton B. (1984). A Galilean Rabbi and his Bible. Jesus' Use of the Interpreted Scripture of His Time. Wilmington, Glazier.
  • Chilton B. (1987). The Isaiah Targum. Introduction, Translation, Apparatus, and Notes: The Aramaic Bible 11. Wilmington, Glazier and Edinburgh, Clark.
  • Chilton B. (1989). Profiles of a Rabbi. Synoptic Opportunities in Reading about Jesus: Brown Judaic Studies 177. Atlanta, Scholars Press.
  • Chilton B. (1992). The Temple of Jesus. His Sacrificial Program Within a Cultural History of Sacrifice. University Park, The Pennsylvania State University Press.
  • Chilton B. (2000a). Rabbi Jesus. An intimate biography. New York, Doubleday.
  • Chilton B. (2000b). Three economies of Rabbi Jesus” in Religion and Economics. New Perspectives: Academic Studies in Religion and the Social Order 16. Eds Bruce Chilton and Jacob Neusner. Binghamton, Global Publications.
  • Chilton B. (2011). “La plate-forme de travail de Marc et le caractereacheve de son oeuvre,” Revue d’Histoireet de Philosophie Religieuses 91.4, pp. 481-506.
  • Greeley A. Catholicism and politics / Religion and the Political Order, pp. 185-195.
  • Haller W. (1932). The Tenure of Kings and Magistrates. The Works of John Milton. New York, Columbia University Press, pp. 8-9.
  • Horsley R. (1996). Archaeology, history, and society in Galilee: The Social Context of Jesus and the Rabbis. Valley Forge, Pa., Trinity Press International.
  • James F. Strange (1997). First Century Galilee from Archaeology and from the Texts. Archaeology and the Galilee. Texts and Contexts in the Graeco-Roman and Byzantine Periods: South Florida Studies in the History of Judaism 143. Atlanta, Scholars Press, pp. 39-48.
  • McCulloch N. and Pacillo G. (2010). The Tobin Tax. A Review of the Evidence. University of Sussex Economics Department Working Paper Series 16, pp. 1-45.
  • Morreall J. (1996). The development of Christian political theory. Religion and the Political Order. Politics in Classical and Contemporary Christianity, Islam, and Judaism: South Florida-Rochester-Saint Lois Studies on Religion and the Social Order. / Ed. by J. N. Neusner. Atlanta, Scholars Press, pp. 173-183.
  • Protestantism and Capitalism. The Weber Thesis and Its Critics. Ed. by R. W. Green; Heath: Boston, 1959.
  • Rousseau J. J. and Arav R. (1995). Capernaum, Jesus and His World. Minneapolis, Fortress, pp. 39-47.
  • Schroeder R. (1992). Max Weber and the sociology of culture. London, SAGE.
Publisher: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Founder: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2076-6297