Pushkinskaya st. 43. office 10
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
e-mail: info@hjournal.ru 
tel. +7(863) 269-88-14

cubsEN (2)

Institutionalism in Russia in 1930-2010s: an inversion cycle?

Institutionalism in Russia in 1930-2010s: an inversion cycle?

Journal of Institutional studies, , Vol. 7 (no. 2),

This inquiry explores and details the slowed and often thwarted development of institutional thought in Russia, and then its later flourishing. I use Alexandr Akhiezer’s term of “inversion cycles” as a way to frame the inquiry, and relatedly, I divide the arrival and advancement of the institutional field of inquiry into two distinct phases, with the first defined as a Thwarted Phase that becomes evident in the 1930s. At the first phase (1930-80-s) there was a complete negation of both the old institutionalism and the new institutionalism. The Flourishing Phase commences with the start of the1990s and continues up to the present. At that stage we can see a broad and uncritical absorption of institutional economics ideas. I draw relationships with how some of the long term effects stemming from the October Revolution of 1917, the founding of the USSR in 1921, and the tradition of dialectical materialism derived from Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, effectively thwarted the institutional approach to Economic Science for almost all of the Soviet era. The Flourishing Phase can be distinguished by the start of the transition to market economy, the emergence of independent presses, and the translation of key institutionalist documents, plus the dissemination of articles and books authored by Russian scholars¾with some reaching into university curriculums. Relatedly, and in conclusion, I offer insights into the prospects for the emergence of a distinct "Russian Institutionalism" and based upon original contributions from Russian scholars relying upon contemporary methodological principles.

Keywords: Russian economic thought; institutional economics; Marxist political economy; Russia; Soviet Union; Thorstein Veblen

  •  Abalkin L. I. (2000a). Selected works in IV volumes. Moscow, JSC "NPO "Economy"", vol. 1. (In Russian).
  • Abalkin L. I. (2000b). Russian school of economic thought: a search for identity. Moscow, Institute of Economics, RAS. (In Russian).
  • Afanas'ev V. S. (1972). Institutionalism. In: Great Soviet Encyclopedia. 3-e ed., vol. 10. Moscow, Soviet Encyclopedia. (In Russian).
  • Akhiezer A. S. (1997). Russia: a critique of historical experience (social and cultural dynamics of Russia). Novosibirsk, Siberian Chronograph, vol. 1. From Past to Future. (In Russian). (In Russian).
  • Alter L. B. (1948). Bourgeois economists in the USA in the service of imperialist reaction. Moscow, Gosplanizdat. (In Russian).
  • Alter L. B. (1961). Bourgeois political economy of the United States. Publ. House of the Socio-Economic Literature. (In Russian).
  • Alter L. B. (1971). Selected works. Bourgeois political economy of the United States. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russian).
  • Ananyin O. (1999). Thorstein Veblen's Research Programme: 100 Years after. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 11, pp. 49-62. (In Russian).
  • Aoki M. (2013). Comparative Institutional Analysis: Theory, Corporations and East Asia. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
  • Baranov A., Malkov E., Polishchuk L., Rochlitz M. and Syunyaev G. (2015). Measuring Institutions in Russian Regions: Methodology, Sources of Data, Analysis.Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 2, pp. 69-103. (In Russian).
  • Battle of Giants: a Debate on International Sociology (Editorial Board). Sociological Yearbook. / Ed. and comp. by N. E. Pokrovskii, D. V. Efremenko. Moscow, INION RAS, 2011. (In Russian).
  • Berdyaev N. (1915). The soul of Russia. Moscow, Printing House of I. D. Sytin’s Association. (In Russian).
  • Bergson A. et al. (1964). Foreword. In: T. W. Schultz (ed.) Transforming Traditional Agriculture. New Haven, CT, Yale University Press.
  • Bessonova O. E. (1997). The handout institutions of the Russian economy: a retrospective analysis. Novosibirsk, IEOPP SB RAS. (In Russian).
  • Bessonova O. E. and Shabanova M. A. (2000). The Novosibirsk economicsociological school. Sociological Studies, no. 8, pp. 79-88. (In Russian).
  • Bloomin I. G. (1928). Subjective school in political economy. Moscow, Publ. House of The Communist Academy. (In Russian).
  • Bloomin I. G. (1930). Essays on modern bourgeois theoretical savings (To the characteristics of the social aspect), Moscow, Publ. House of the Communist Academy. (In Russian).
  • Bloomin I. G. (1961). History of economic thought (essays on the theory). / Ed. by F. Y. Polyanskiy. Moscow, State Publ. House "High School". (In Russian).
  • Bloomin I. G. (1962). Institutionalism. In: Critique of bourgeois political economy (3 volumes), vol. II. Criticism of modern English and American political economy. Moscow, Publ. House of The Communist Academy, pp. 336-352. (In Russian).
  • Coase R. H. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica, New Series, vol. 4, no. 16. Nov., pp. 386-405.
  • Colander D. (2006/2000). Economic science of the new Millennium: how she found her path and what is it? In: Origins. From the Experience of Studying Economics as Structure and Process. Moscow, Publ. House of HSE. (In Russian).
  • Colander D., Holt R. and Rosser J. B. Jr. (2004). The Changing Face of Mainstream Economics. Review of Political Economy, no. 16 (4), pp. 485-499.
  • Dafermos M. (1995). The political economy of socialism: history and reality. Moscow, vol. 2, pp. 91-118. (http://ilhs.narod.ru/vip26.htm - Access Date: 01.03.2015). (In Russian).
  • Davydova I. (1997). “Die Nowosibirsker Soziologische Schule: Aufstieg und Niedergang eines regionalen sozialwissenschaftlichen Zentrums” // Ingrid Oswald, Ralf Possekel, Stykow Petra, Wielgolis Jan (Hg.) Socialwissenschaft in Rusland. Bd 2. Analysen russischer Forschungen zu Sozialstruktur, Wählerverhalten, Regionalentwicklung, ethnischen Konflikten, Geopolitik, nationalen Interessen und Sowjetgeschichte. Berlin, Berliner Debatte, pp. 151-172.
  • Dequech D. (2007). Neoclassical, Mainstream, Orthodox, and Heterodox Economics. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, no. 30 (2), pp. 279-302.
  • Durkheim E. (1990). About the division of labor in society. The method of sociology. Moscow, Science [Nauka] Publ. (In Russian).
  • Ellman M. (2009). What is the contribution of research works on the Soviet economy into the economic mainstream theory? Moscow, Institute of Economics, RAS. (In Russian).
  • Fioretos O. (2011). Historical Institutionalism in International Relations. International Organization, vol. 65, Issue 02, April, pp. 367-399.
  • Frolov D. P. (2002). Institutionalism in metaconcert economic theory // Proceedings of the Scientific Session. Vol. 1: Economics and Finance. Volgograd, Publ. House of the Volgograd State University. (In Russian).
  • Frolov D. P. (2003). The evolution of Russian economic institutionalism, IX-XX centuries. Dissertation... of Candidate of Economic Sciences. Volgograd, Volgograd State University. (In Russian).
  • Frolov D. P. (2007). How to teach the institutionalism in Russia. Economic Herald of the Rostov State University, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 155-164. (In Russian).Frolov D. P. (2008). Institutional evolution in the post-Soviet institutionalism. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 4, pp. 130-139. (In Russian).
  • Frolov D. P. (2009). Prospects of development of Russian institutional Economics. Report on the First Economic Congress, December 10, 2009. (http://www.econorus.org/consp/d21.html - Access Date: 12.05.2015). (In Russian).
  • Glezerman G. E., Kelly V. J. and Pilipenko N. V. (1971). Historical materialism –the theory and methodology of scientific cognition and revolutionary actions. Communist, no. 4, pp. 60-70. (In Russian).
  • Great Soviet Encyclopedia (1953). 2-nd ed., vol. 18. Moscow, Soviet Encyclopedia. (In Russian).
  • Hamilton D. (1962). Why is Institutional economics not institutional? The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, vol. 21, No. 3, July, pp. 309-317.
  • Hamilton W. H. (1916). The Development of Hoxie's Economics’. Journal of Political Economy, no. 24(9), November, pp. 855-883.
  • Hamilton W. H. (1919). The Institutional Approach to Economic Theory. American Economic Review, no. 9(1), Supplement, pp. 309-318.
  • Heilbroner R. (1989). Behind the Veil of Economics. New York, Norton.
  • Hirshleifer J. (1985). The Expanded Domain of Economics. American Economic Review, December, vol. 75, pp. 53-68.
  • History of Economic Thought (2000). / Ed. by V. S. Avtonomov, O. I. Anan, N. A. Makasheva. Moscow, Publ. House INFRA-M. (In Russian).
  • Inshakov O. V. and Frolov D. P. (2002). Institutionalism in Russian economic thought (IX-XXI centuries). 2 vol. Volgograd, Publ. House of the Volgograd State University. (In Russian).
  • International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (1968). Ed. by David L. Sills and Robert K. Merton, vol. 4. A. Economic Thought: The Institutional School. New York, The Macmillan Company & The Free Press. 
  • Institutional Matrices Theory (2010). Sociological Dictionary. / Ed. by G. V. Osipov, L. N. Moskvichev. Moscow, Publ. House INFRA-M. (In Russian).
  • Institutional Trap (by V. Polterovich) (2008). The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Second Edition. Ed. by S. N. Durlauf, L. E. Blume. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230226203.0809.
  • Ippolitov L. M. (2008). The origin institutionalists economic theory in Russia (about one methodological discussion of the 1920s). Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, no. 4, pp. 43-57. (In Russian).
  • Ivanov N. V. (2003). Novosibirsk sociological school. Sociological Encyclopedia, vol. 2. Moscow, Thought [Mysl] Publ. (In Russian).
  • Keizer P. (2007). The Concept of Institution in Economics and Sociology, a Methodological Exposition. Working Papers Series. 07-25. Tjalling C. Koopmans Research Institute Utrecht School of Economics, Utrecht University
  • Kirdina S. G. (2004). Post-Soviet institutionalism in Russia: an attempt of survey. Economic Herald of the Rostov state University, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 40-53. (In Russian).
  • Kirdina S. G. (2008). Theory and practice of modern development methodology deny individualism. Economist, no. 8, pp. 58-77. (In Russian).
  • Kirdina S. G. (2013). Methodological individualism and methodological institutionalism. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 10, pp. 66-89. (In Russian).
  • Kleiner G. B. (1996). Russia's Economy of Today as "the Economy of Physical Entities". Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 4, pp. 86-93. (In Russian).
  • Kozlova K. B. (1987). Institutionalism in American political economy. Moscow, Science [Nauka] Publ. (In Russian).
  • Lawson T. (2006). The Nature of Heterodox Economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, no. 30 (4), pp. 483-505.
  • Levin S. N. (2014). On the prospects of institutional economics community in the post-Soviet space. Journal of Institutional Studies, no. 2, pp. 6-9. (In Russian).Litvintseva G. P. (1999). Introduction to institutional economic theory: Textbook. allowance. Novosibirsk, Publ. House of NSTU. (In Russian).
  • Litvintseva G. P. (2001). Glossary of institutional economics. (http://vocable.ru/dictionary/96 - Access date: 02.03.2013). (In Russian).
  • Lvov D. S. (2001). Institutional Economics. Moscow, Publ. House INFRA-M. (In Russian).
  • Makasheva N. (2006). Economic science in Russia during the transformation period (late 1980s-1990s): revolution and the growth of scientific knowledge. In: Origins. From the Experience of Studying Economics As Structure and Process. Moscow, Publ. House of HSE, pp. 400-426. (In Russian).
  • Matveeva S. (1997). A divided society: the path and the fate of Russia in the sociocultural theory of Alexander Akhiezer. Preface. article in: A. S. Akhiezer. Russia: a Critique of Historical Experience, vol. 1. Social and Cultural Dynamics of Russia. / 2-nd ed., Rev. and advanced. Novosibirsk, Siberian Chronograph Publ., pp. 4-60. (In Russian).
  • Matveeva S. Y. (1998). Preface. As a possible utopian society: the experience of social and cultural dictionary of the monograph. In: A. S. Akhiezer. Russia: a Critique of Historical Experience, vol. 2. Socio-Cultural Dictionary. / 2-nd ed., Rev. and advanced. Novosibirsk, Siberian Chronograph Publ., pp. 4-62. (In Russian).
  • Moscowsky L. (2005). The limits of institutionalism. Economist, no. 6, pp. 74-81. (In Russian).
  • Nureev R. (2007). Thorstein Veblen: a view from the XXI century. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 7, pp. 73-58. (In Russian).
  • Nureev R. M. and Dementyev V. V. (2005). The formation of post-Soviet institutionalism. / Post-Soviet institutionalism / Ed. by R. M. Nureev, V. V. Dementyev. Donetsk, Chestnut [Kashtan] Publ., pp. 446-479. (In Russian).
  • Olsevich Y. Y. (2004). Transformation of economic systems. A course of lectures. Moscow, Publ. House of Moscow State University. (In Russian).
  • Pokydchenko M. G. (2005). Socio-economic thought in Russia in the middle of the XVIII – beginning of XX century: Pokydchenko M. G., Speranskaya L. N.,
  • Drobyshevskaya T. A. Ways of Development of Russia's Economy: Theory and Practice. Moscow, Publ. House INFRA-M. (In Russian).
  • Polanyi K. (1977). The Livelihood of Man (Studies in Social Discontinuity). N.-Y., Academic Press, Inc.
  • Polishchuk L. (2013). Institutional Performance. In: Weber, S., Alexeev, M. V. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of the Russian Economy. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 189-220.
  • Polterovich V. M. (2001). Transplantation of economic institutions. Economic Science of Modern Russia, no. 3, pp. 24-50. (In Russian).
  • Polterovich V. M. (2007). Elements of the theory of reforms. Moscow, Economics [Ekonomika] Publ. (In Russian).
  • Polterovich V. M. and Starkov O. Y. (2007). The formation of the mortgage inncatching-up economies: the problem of transplantation. Moscow, Science [Nauka] Publ. (In Russian).
  • Polterovich V., Popov V. and Tonis A. (2007). Economic policy, quality of institutions and mechanisms of resource curse. Moscow, Publ. House of SU-HSE. (In Russian).
  • Rozmainsky I. V. and Holodilin K. A. (2000). History of economic analysis in the West. St. Petersburg, Publ. House of St. Petersburg State University. (In Russian).
  • Rubinstein A. (2012). Social liberalism: economic methodology. Social Studies and Modernity, no. 6, pp. 13-34. (In Russian).
  • Shabanova M. A. (2001). Institutional change and non-legal practice // In: Just Who Strives to Russia? Actors Macro, Meso and Micro Levels of the Modern Transformation / Ed. by T. I. Zaslavskaya. Moscow, Moscow School of Social and Economic Sciences, pp. 319-326. (In Russian).
  • Sikora V. D. (1983). Anti-Orthodox economic theory (critical analysis). Kiev,High School Publ. (In Russian).
  • Sorokina S. G. (1981). Future scenarios or the illusions of the past: About the institutionalism as the direction of bourgeois political thought. Moscow, Publ. House "Thought [Mysl]". (In Russian).
  • The Choice Is Clear. Handout Russia's Economy. January 20, 2015. (http://echo.msk.ru/programs/vyboryasen/1477056-echo/echo.msk.ru/programs/vyboryasen/1477056-echo/ - Access Date: 08.05.2015). (In Russian).
  • The Materials of the XXVI Congress of the CPSU (1981). Moscow, Politizdat. (http://publ.lib.ru/ARCHIVES/K/KPSS/_KPSS.html#026 – Access Date: 20.03.2015). (In Russian).
  • The Network of Institutional Economics Departments in the Universities of Russia. Economic Science of Modern Russia, 1999, no. 3, pp. 172-173. (In Russian).
  • The Political Economy. (1953). Tutorial. Second, Supplemented ed. Moscow, Gospolitizdat, Academy of Sciences: Institute of Economics. (In Russian).
  • Toffler A. (1971). Future shock. London, Macmillan.
  • Urban O. A. (2014). The social mechanism of the institutional transformation of a mono-product economy in the region. The dissertation on competition of a scientific degree of Dr. of Sociological Sciences. Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk National Research State University. (In Russian).
  • Veblen T. (1984 [1899]). The theory of the leisure class. Moscow, Progress Publ. (In Russian).
  • Veblen T. (2006 [1898]). Why is Economics not an evolutionary discipline. In: Origins. From the experience of studying Economics as structure and process. Moscow, Publ. House of HSE.
  • Williamson O. E. (1985). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York, Free Press.
  • Yadov V. A. (1990). Reflections on the subject of sociology. Sociological Studies, no. 2, pp. 3-16. (In Russian).
  • Zaslavskaya T. I. (1985). On the social mechanism of economic development // Ways to Improve the Social Mechanism of Development of the Soviet Economy. Novosibirsk, IEOPP SB as USSR. (In Russian).
  • Zaslavskaya T. I. (1995). The social mechanism of transformation of the Russian society, Sociological Journal, no. 3, pp. 5-21. (In Russian).
  • Zaslavskaya T. I. (2007). Selected works: in 3 volumes Volume 3. My life: recollections and reflections. Moscow, Publ. House "Economy [Ekonomika]". (In Russian).
  • Zaslavskaya T. I. and Ryvkina R. V. (1991). The sociology of economic life: essays on the theory. Novosibirsk, Science [Nauka] Publ. (In Russian).
  • Zweynert J. (2008). Russian Economic Ideas since Perestroika: Between Path Dependence and Paradigm Shift. The History of Economic Thought. Series: The History of Economic Thought in Transitional Countries, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 1-22.
  • Zweynert J. (2010). Conflicting Patterns of Thought in the Russian Debate on Transition: 2003-2007. Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 547-569.
Publisher: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Founder: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Online ISSN: 2412-6039
ISSN: 2076-6297