Pushkinskaya st. 43. office 10
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
344082
e-mail: info@hjournal.ru 
tel. +7(863) 269-88-14

cubsEN (2)

Perceptions of Higher Education Reforms in Russia: the Role of Institutions and Social Capital

Perceptions of Higher Education Reforms in Russia: the Role of Institutions and Social Capital

Journal of Institutional Studies, , Vol. 8 (no. 2),

Recent reforms of higher education in Russia are aimed at boosting the quality and efficiency of the educational process. Nevertheless, in most cases, implemented institutional and organizational innovations do not work properly. Calculative technologies and various ratings, which are widespread today, opened up the opportunities for regular managerial interventions. These interventions are not neutral. In Russian higher education, the mania for measurement resulted in a deficit of trust and rampant bureaucracy. Historically, the system of higher education has been based on specific values and institutions. Academic freedom and autonomy are extremely important for the members of the academic community, and these values cannot be eliminated. Implemented reforms destroy old institutions and organizational structures. However, new institutions, being inconsistent with present working rules and practices, are not able to replace the old ones. Such inconsistency can result in inefficiency. Social capital plays a crucial role for development and growth in the field of higher education. The structure of social capital in the field embraces three components: trust, social engagement and social integration. These elements must be taken into account when implementing educational reforms. The higher the employees are motivated and experience personal growth, the more they feel embedded in their job. We have analyzed the discourses of the key actors within the universities of Rostov Region. The discourse analysis shows that bureaucracy, constant institutional and organizational changes and the reduction of academic freedom are perceived as significant factors that influence labor productivity, organizational efficiency and the quality of educational services in the field of higher education.


Keywords: higher education; institutional change; social capital; bureaucracy; trust; institutional economics.

References:
  • Bourdieu P. (1997). “The Forms of Social Capital.” In Education, Culture, Economy, Society, edited by A. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown, and A. Stuart-Wells. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Fatima M., Shafique M., Qadeer F. and Ahmad R. (2015). HR Practices and Employee Performance Relationship in Higher Education: Mediating Role of Job Embeddedness, Perceived Organizational Support and Trust. Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 421-439.
  • Fuller C. (2014). Social Capital and the role of trust in aspirations for higher education. Educational Review, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 131–147.
  • Graham L. (2014). Can Russia compete? A history of innovation in tsarist, Soviet and modern Russia. Moscow, Mann, Ivanov and Ferber Publ. (In Russian).
  • Harvey M. G., Sigerstad T., Kuffel T. S., Novicevic M. M. and Keaton P. N. (2006). Faculty role categories: A dean's management challenge. Journal of Education for Business, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 230-236.
  • Hayek F. A. (2000a). Socialist Calculation III: The Competitive “Solution”. Individualism and Economic Order. Moscow, Publ. House Izogran. (In Russian).
  • Hayek F. A. (2000b). The Use of Knowledge in Society. Individualism and Economic Order. Moscow, Publ. House Izogran. (In Russian).
  • Hoy W. K. and Tschannen-Moran M. (1999). Five faces of trust: An empirical confirmation in urban elementary schools. Journal of School Leadership, no. 9, pp. 184–208.
  • Hoy W. K. and Tschannen-Moran M. (2003). The conceptualization and measurement of faculty trust in schools: The omnibus T-scale. In W. Hoy & C. Miskel, (Eds.), Studies in Leading and Organizing School, pp. 181–208. Greenwich, CT, Information Age Publishing.
  • Interview with R. Coase. (1999). Quarter Bulletin of the Club of Economists, issue 1, no. 4. (In Russian).
  • Jonasson C., Normann J. and Lauring J. (2014). Faculty trust, conflict and the use of knowledge in an international higher education context. Journal of Educational Sciences and Psychology, vol. IV, no. 2, pp. 1-14.
  • Kahneman D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow, New York, Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  • Kurbatova M. V. (2013). Not Only Wages: Professors of Universities on the Way to Become a Cog in the Education Machine. ECO, no. 10, pp. 110-122. (In Russian).
  • Kurbatova M. V., Levin S. N. and Kagan E. S. (2010). The Structure of Social Capital as the Factor of Social Development of the Region. Social Sciences and Modernity, no. 6, pp. 37-51. (In Russian).
  • Kurbatova M. V., Levin S. N. and Kagan E. S. (2013). The Structure of Entrepreneurs' Social Capital in Their Interaction with Regional Authorities. Journal of Institutional Studies, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 108-126. (In Russian).
  • Kvale S. (2003). The qualitative research interview. Moscow, Publ. House Smysl. (In Russian).
  • Luhmann N. (1979). Trust and power. Chichester, Wiley.
  • Luhmann N. (1988). Familiarity, confidence and trust: problems and alternatives. In D.G. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, pp. 94-107. New York, Blackwell.
  • Mises L. (2006). Bureaucracy. Planned Chaos. Chelyabinsk, Publ. House Socium. (In Russian).
  • Mitchell T. R., Holtom B. C., Lee T. W., Sablynski C. J. and Erez M. (2001). Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1102-1121.
  • Morrow V. (1999). Conceptualising Social Capital in Relation to the Well Being of Children and Young People: A Critical Review. The Sociological Review, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 744–765.
  • Oguz F. (2010). Hayek on tacit knowledge. Journal of Institutional Economics, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 145-165.
  • Power M. (2004) Counting, control and calculation: reflections on measuring and measurement. Human Relations, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 765–783.
  • Putman R. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York, Simon and Schuster.
  • Putnam R. (2001). Social capital: Measurement and consequences. Canadian Journal of Policy Research, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 41-51.
  • Rhoades L. and Eisenberger R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 87, no. 4, 698-714.
  • Rutherford M. (2012). Field, Undercover, and Participant Observers in US Labor Economics, 1900-1930. TERRA ECONOMICUS, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 91-106. (In Russian).
  • Sahlberg P. (2006). Education Reform for Raising Economic Competitiveness. Journal of Educational Change, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 259-287.
  • Salaran M. (2010). Research productivity and social capital in Australian higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 133-148.
  • Sidhu R. (2013). Risky custodians of trust: Instruments of quality in higher education. International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 69-84.
  • Smith P. A. and Shoho A. R. (2007). Higher Education Trust, Rank and Race: A Conceptual and Empirical Analysis. Innovative Higher Education, no. 32, pp. 125-138.
  • Tambovtsev V. L. (2015a). Social Policy: Unresolved Problem of Scientific Justification. Social Sciences and Modernity, no. 6, pp. 5-13. (In Russian).
  • Tambovtsev V. L. (2015b). The Scientific Basis for the Higher Education Reforms. Omsk University Bulletin. Series «Economics», no. 2, pp. 66-70. (In Russian).
  • Tonkaboni F., Yousefy A. and Keshtiaray N. (2013). Description and Recognition the Concept of Social Capital in Higher Education System. International Education Studies, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 40-50.
  • Volchik V. V. (2011). Institutions, Economic Coordination and Tacit Knowledge. TERRA ECONOMICUS, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 17-22. (In Russian).
  • Volchik V. V. (2012). The issue of confidence and institutional modernization. TERRA ECONOMICUS, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 12-18. (In Russian).
  • Volchik V. V., Filonenko Yu. V. and Krivosheeva-Medyantseva D. D. (2015). Adaptive Rationality, Adaptive Behavior and Institutions. Journal of Institutional Studies, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 138-155. (In Russian).
  • Williamson O. (1993). Behavioral preconditions of modern economic analysis. THESIS, issue 3, pp. 39-49. (In Russian).
  • Yefimov V. M. (2016). Economic science in question: another methodology, history and research practices. Moscow, KURS: INFRA-M Publ. (In Russian).
Publisher: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Founder: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Online-ISSN: 2412-6039
ISSN: 2076-6297