Pushkinskaya st. 43. office 10
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
344082
e-mail: info@hjournal.ru 
tel. +7(863) 269-88-14

cubsEN (2)

Opportunism of University Lecturers As a Way to Adaptate the External Control Activities Strengthening

Opportunism of University Lecturers As a Way to Adaptate the External Control Activities Strengthening

Journal of Institutional Studies, , Vol. 8 (no. 3),

At the present the Russian government is undertaking a higher education system reform actively introducing management tools of new public management. Implementation of these instruments is accompanied by the transformation of universities in the customer-oriented organizations and lecturers into the employees. There is a substitution of incentives based on the existing informal norms of academic standards and reputation mechanisms of control to the incentives based on the quasi-market conditions artificially generated by the state and corresponding to the mechanisms of external assessment and monitoring. Practices changing used by lecturers to follow their interests is the inevitable result and more widespread form is opportunism. The purpose of the paper is to characterize the forms of manifestation of opportunistic behavior of university lecturers emerging as a result of changes in the nature of lecturers’ contract in the conditions of university governance managerisation. The main forms of lecturers’ opportunism and assesses of its degree based on data analysis of the two waves of the expert survey on the problems of assessing the impact of implementation mechanisms of external evaluation of their activities and the questionnaire survey of lecturers more than 40 Russian universities of different status are described as well as lecturers’ strategy of behavior, which are presented as a combination of different severity practices used by opportunistic behavior is highlighted. It shows the relation between the non-observance of academic freedom and the choice of lecturers’ strategies conduct. It is proved that the lecturers of Russian universities depending on the accumulated stocks of human and social capital as well as the resource capacity of separate universities are choosing different strategies to follow their own interests, which differ in the level of shirking in different areas of activity. All this is accompanied by deterioration in the academic environment, the restriction of academic freedom and the reduction of academic standards.


Keywords: education reforms; university; academic freedom; academic standards; external control; opportunistic behavior; shirking; integral estimation.

References:
  • Abramov R. N., Gruzdev I. A. and Terentyev E. A. (2015). Academic Professionalism in an Era of Change: Role of Subidentity and Transformation Time Budgets. Monitoring of Public Opinion, no. 6, pp. 136-152. (In Russian).
  • Balatsky E. V. (2014). The Estimation of Academic Rent. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 10, pp. 97-113. (In Russian).
  • Balatsky E. V. (2015). New Trends in the Development of the University Sector. Universe of Russia, no. 4, pp. 72-98. (In Russian).
  • Baranov I. N. (2012). New Public Management: the Evolution of the Theory and Practice Implementation. Russian Journal of Management, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 51-64. (In Russian).
  • Bess J. L. (2011). Contracts, the Bureaucracy and the Motivation of the Lecturers: Possible Effects of the Lack of Permanent Hiring // Contracts in the Academic World. Moscow, Publ. House of Higher School of Economics, pp. 57-90. (In Russian).
  • Breaking the Silence: The Hidden Injuries of Neo-Liberal Academia (2010). / Ryan-Flood, Róisín; Gill, Rosalind. Secrecy and silence in the research process: feminist reflections. ed. / Róisín Ryan-Flood; Rosalind Gill. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY, Routledge, pp. 228-244.
  • Chomsky N. (2014). On Academic Labor. Counterpunch Magazine. (http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/02/28/on-academic-labor/).
  • Dim R. (2004). «New Managerialism» and Higher Education: Managing Quality and Productivity of Work in UK Universities. Educational Studies [Voprosy Obrazovaniya], no. 3, pp. 44-56. (In Russian).
  • Enders J. (2011). The Cathedral System in Transition: Appointment, Promotion, and Barriers to Entry into the Profession in the German Higher Education // Contracts in the Academic World. Moscow, Publ. House of Higher School of Economics, pp. 195-227. (In Russian).
  • Head S. (2011). What Threatens British Universities? Educational Studies [Voprosy Obrazovaniya], no. 2, pp. 282-295. (In Russian).
  • Jarvis H. and Pratt A. (2006). Bringing it All Back Home: The Extensification and «Overflowing» Of Work: The Case of San Francisco’s New Media Households. Geoforum, 37, pp. 331-339. (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/854/1/Bringing_it_all_back_home_(LSERO).pdf).
  • Kagan E. S. (2015). Building a Comprehensive Evaluations of the Effectiveness of the University and Public Formalization of the Lecturer. News of Altai State University, vol. 1, no. 1(85), pp. 152-157. (In Russian).
  • Kouzminov Ya. and Yudkevich M. (2007). Academic Freedom and the Standards of Behavior, Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 6, pp. 80-93. (In Russian).
  • Kozmina Y. Y. (2014). Preferences of University Professors Regarding Research Activities and Teaching. Educational Studies [Voprosy Obrazovaniya], no. 3, pp. 135-151. (In Russian).
  • Kurbatova M. V. and Kagan E. S. (2015). Assessment of the Significance of the Effects of External Control Activities of University Lecturers. Journal of Institutional Studies, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 122-143. (In Russian).
  • Marks Denton (2005). Academic Standards as Public Goods. Opportunities for Opportunistic Behavior. Educational Studies [Voprosy Obrazovaniya], no. 4. pp. 127-151. (In Russian).
  • McCormick R. E. and Myers R. E. (2011). University of Management: A View from the Perspective of Property Rights // Contracts in the Academic World. Moscow, Publ. House of Higher School of Economics, pp. 127-158. (In Russian).
  • Monitoring of Education Economics. Indicators of Education Economics. The Total Working Time of Regular Lecturers of Educational Institutions of Higher Education (hours per week). (https://www.hse.ru/data/2016/06/21/1116119242/%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%8B%20(dragged)%207.pdf - Access Date: 01.08.2016). (In Russian).
  • Ridings B. (2010). University in Ruins. Moscow, Publ. House of Higher School of Economics, 304 p. (In Russian).
  • Roshchina Y. M. and Yudkevich M. M. (2009). Factors of University Lecturers’ Research Activity: Administration Policy, Contractual Incompleteness, or Impact the Environment? Educational Studies [Voprosy Obrazovaniya], no. 3, pp. 203-228. (In Russian).
  • Tambovtsev V. L. (2005). Economic Theory of Institutional Change. Moscow, TEIS Publ., 542 p. (In Russian).
  • Tambovtsev V. L. (2006). Outcomes of Education Sector and the Problem of Its Measurement of Educational Technology. Educational Studies [Voprosy Obrazovaniya], no. 1, pp. 5-24. (In Russian).
  • Tambovtsev V. and Rozhdestvenskaya I. (2014). Reform of Higher Education in Russia: International Experience and Economic Theory. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 5, pp. 97-108. (In Russian).
  • Volchik V. V. (2013). Reform of the Russian System of the Higher Education: the Role of Myths and Institutions. Terra Economicus, no. 2, pp. 94-103. (In Russian).
  • Williamson O. (1993). Behavioral Prerequisites of Modern Economic Analysis. THESIS, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 39-49. (In Russian).
Publisher: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Founder: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Online-ISSN: 2412-6039
ISSN: 2076-6297