Pushkinskaya st. 43. office 10
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
e-mail: info@hjournal.ru 
tel. +7(863) 269-88-14

cubsEN (2)

Imitation Modeling and Institutional Studies

Imitation Modeling and Institutional Studies

Journal of Institutional Studies, , Vol. 9 (no. 3),

This article discusses the use of imitation modeling in the conduct of institutional research. The institutional approach is based on the observation of social behavior. To understand a social process means to determine the key rules that individuals use, undertaking social actions associated with this process or phenomenon. This does not mean that institutions determine behavioral reactions, although there are a number of social situations where the majority of individuals follow the dominant rules. If the main laws of development of the institutional patterns are known, one can describe most of the social processes accurately. The author believes that the main difficulty with the analysis of institutional processes is their recursive nature: from the standards of behavior one may find the proposed actions of social agents who follow, obey or violate institutions, but the possibility of reconstructive analysis is not obvious. The author demonstrates how the institutional approach is applied to the analysis of social behavior. The article describes the basic principles and methodology of imitation modeling. Imitation modeling reveals the importance of institutions in structuring social transactions. The article concludes that in the long term institutional processes are not determined by initial conditions.

Keywords: new institutionalism, imitation modeling, institutions, methodology, virtual agents

  • Abrahamson, D., Wilensky, U. and Levin, J. (2007). Agent-Based Modeling as a Bridge between Cognitive and Social Perpsectives on Learning. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Associaton, Chicago, IL.
  • Abreu, D. and Rubinstein, A. (1988). The Structure of Nash Equilibrium in Repeated Games with Finite Automata. Econometrica, 56, 1259–1282.
  • An, G. and Wilensky, U. (2009). From Artificial Life to in Silico Medicine: NetLogo as a Means of Translational Knowledge Representation in Biomedical Research’, in Adamatzty A. and M. Komosinski (eds.) Artificial Life Models in Software (2n ed.), Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • Aslan, U. and Wilensky, U. (2016). Restructuration in Practice: Challenging a Pop-Culture Evolutionary Theory through Agent Based Modeling, in Proceedings of the Constructionism, 2016 Conference. Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Barbashin, M. Y. (2005). Contemporary Sociological Approaches in Ethnic Studies. The Social-Humanitarian Knowledge, 4, 167–180. (In Russian).
  • Barbashin, M. Y. (2011). Institutional Democracy and Social Dilemmas: the Experience of Post-Soviet Transformations. Saarbrucken, Germany: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing. (In Russian).
  • Barbashin, M. Y. (2013a). Contemporary Ethnogenesis: Methodological Opportunities of the Theory of Institutional Disintegration. Sotsialno-gumanitarnye znaniya, 7, 48–56. (In Russian).
  • Barbashin, M. Y. (2013b) “The Soviet Man” in Ethnic-Social Space of the Caucasus: Ethnic and Institutional Processes. Politics and Society, 3, 368–372. (In Russian).
  • Barbashin, M. Y. (2014). Methodological Opportunities of the ‘Bloomington School’ and Perspectives of Contemporary New Institutionalism. Jurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii, XVIII, 1, 98–112. (In Russian).
  • Barbashin, M. Y. (2016a). The Theory of Institutional Disintegration: Conceptual Potential and Methodological Frameworks. Jurnal institutsionalnyh issledovaniy, 8(1), 36–54. (In Russian).
  • Barbashin, M. Y. (2016b). The Institutional Theory of Ethnicity. Etnographicheskoe obozrenie, 3, 112–127.
  • Blikstein, P. and Wilensky, U. (2009). An Atom is Known by the Company it Keeps: A Constructionist Learning Environment for Materials Science Using Multi-Agent Simulation. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 14(2), 81–119.
  • Bollinger, L. A., van Blijswik, M. J. Dijkema, G. P. and Nikolic, I. (2016). An Energy Systems Modelling Tool for the Social Simulation Community. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 19(1).
  • Brutschy, A., Pini, G., Pinciroli, C., Birattari, M. and Dorigo, M. (2013). Self-Organized Task Allocation to Sequently Indeterdependent Tasks in Swarm Robotics. Automous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 28(1), 101–125.
  • Chelvalier, J. M. and Buckles, D. J. (2013). Participatory Action Research: Theory and Methods for Engaged Inquiry. London: Routledge.
  • Dickerson, M. (2015). Agent-based modeling and NetLogo in the Introductory Computer Science Curriculum: Tutorial Presentation. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 30(5), 174–177.
  • Durkheim, E. (1991). The Method of Sociology. Moscow: Respublika. (In Russian).
  • Federyakov, A. S. (2011). The Development of Models, Algorithms and Program Frameworks for Improvement of Prognosis of Market Indicators with the Implementation of Multi-Agents Approach. Dissertation. Moscow: NOU VPO RNO. (In Russian).
  • Fujimoto, Richard M. (2001). Parallel Simulation: Parallel and Distributed Simulation Systems in Proceedings of the 33-nd Conference on Winter Simulation, WSC, 01, Washington, DC, USA: IEES Computer Society: 147–157.
  • Janssen, M., Holchan, R., Lee, A. and Ostrom, E. (2010). Lab Experiments for the Study of Social-Ecological Systems. Science, 328(5978).
  • Hurwicz, L. (1996). Institutions as Families of Game Forms. Japanese Economic Review, 47(2), 113–132.
  • Isaacs, R. (1967). Differential Games. Moscow: Mir. (in Russian).
  • Kushner, H. J. and Yin C. C. (1997). Stochastic Approximation Algorithms and Applications. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
  • Lalonde, W. and Pu, J. (1991). Subclassing ≠ subtyping ≠ is-a. Journal of Object-Oriented Programming, 3(5), 57–62.
  • Law, Averill. (2007). Simulation Modeling and Analysis. Boston: McGraw – Hill.
  • Lewis, M. A., and Bekey, G. A. (1992). The Behavioral Self-organization of Nanorobots Using Local Rules in Proceedings of the IEEE / RSJ International Conference of Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2, 1333–1338.
  • Metropolis, N. and Ulam, S. (1949). The Monte Carlo Method. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 44, 335–341.
  • Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (2002). The Evolutional Theory of Institutional Changes. Moscow: Delo. (In Russian).
  • Neumann, von John and Morgenstein, O. (1970). Game Theory and Economic Behavior. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russian).
  • Norbert, E. (2001). About Civilizations. Sociological and Psychological Studies. Moscow-SPb: Universitetskaya kniga. (In Russian).
  • North, D. (1997). Institutions, Institutional Change and the Functioning of Economy. Moscow: Nachala. (In Russian).
  • Nummelin, E. (1989). Common Markov Chains and Non-Negative Operators. Moscow: Mir. (In Russian).
  • Ostrom, E. (2010). Governing the Commons. Moscow: Mysl’. (In Russian),
  • Ostrom, E. (2011). Background on the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1).
  • Persha, L., Harry, F., Ashwini, Ch., Agrawal, A. and Benson, C. (2010). Biodiversity Conservation and Livelihoods in Human-dominated Landscapes: Forest Commons in South Asia. Biological Conservation, 143, 298–292.
  • Polhill, J. G. and Gotts, N. M. (2009). Ontologies for Transparent Integrated Humannatural Systems Modelling. Landscape Ecology, 24(9), 1255–1267.
  • Record, N. (2004). Strategies of Currency Broker. Moscow: Internet-trading. (In Russian).
  • Schank, R. and Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Scott, N., Livingston, M., Hart, A., Wilson, J., Moore, D. and Dietze, P. (2016). SimDrink: An Agent-Based NetLogo Model of Young, Heavy Drinkers for Conducting Alcohol Policy Experiments. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 19(1).
  • Sifat Momen, Kazi Tanjila Tabassum. (2015). Group Performance in a Swarm of Simulated Mobile Robots. Ulab Journal of Science and Engineering, 6(1), November.
  • Simon, Herbert. (1963). Problems of Methodology – Discussion. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 53(2), 229–231.
  • Stieff, M. and Wilensky, U. (2001). NetLogo Buffer Model. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL. 
  • Taleb, Nassim Nicholas. (2009). The Black Swan. Moscow: KoLibri. (in Russian).
  • Taylor, R. I. (2003). Agent-based Modelling Incorporating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: A Case Study Investigating the Impact of E-commerce upon the Value Change. Ph.D. Thesis, Centre for Policy Modelling, Manchester Metropolitan University. CPM Report No. CPM-03-137.
  • Tinker, R. and Wilensky, U. (2007). NetLogo Climate Change Model. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
  • Tirole, J. (1996). A Theory of Collective Reputations (with Applications to the Persistence of Corruption and to Firm Quality). Review of Economic Studies, 63(1), 1–22.
  • Wilensky, U. (1998). NetLogo Koch Curve Model. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
  • Wilensky, U. (2005). NetLogo Optical Illusion Model. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
  • Wilensky, U. (2016). NetLogo Signaling Game Model. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
  • Williamson, O. E. (2005). The Economics of Governance. American Economic Review, 95(2), 1–18.
  • Zahadat P., S. Hahshold, R. Thenius, K. Crailsheim and Sahnicki T. (2016). From Hoonebees to Robots and Back: Division of Labor Based on Partioning Social Inhabition.
  • Bioinspiration and Biometrics, 10(6), 15. “Libraries”. (www.ccl.northwestern.edu –Access date: 19 July, 2017).
Publisher: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Founder: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Online-ISSN: 2412-6039
ISSN: 2076-6297