Pushkinskaya st. 43. office 10
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
344082
e-mail: info@hjournal.ru 
tel. +7(863) 269-88-14

cubsEN (2)

Institutional Determinants of Thermal Power Sector Economic Productivity

Institutional Determinants of Thermal Power Sector Economic Productivity

Journal of Institutional Studies, , Vol. 11 (no. 1),

In relation to development of the energy industry of Russia from the point of view of the recent economic developments such as, for example, economic and financial crisis, the phenomena in the market and investment constraints, as well as the issues of handling production assets and capital of electrical power corporations and enhancing the accuracy of development of thermal power plants asset management methods gain specific significance. It becomes apparent that certain substantial economic measures and reforms are needed for increasing the vitality of the power sector in general and thermal power plant sector in particular. Our paper focuses on the institutional determinants of the thermal power sector that are undertaken with a purpose of enhancing its economic and financial productivity. We analyze the neo-institutional standpoint which proclaims that reforming the energy sector involves reorganizing regulatory and governance frameworks involving market-based demand and supply conditions by slowly reducing the monopolistic features of manufacturing and distribution of power. Moreover, we investigate whether incomplete power industry reforms, or incompatible associations and associations originating out of reforms, have led to exacerbating power industry inefficiencies. Our results show that thermal power sector in Russia is in need of substantial re-organization and profound reforms that would increase its viability and economic productivity.


Keywords: thermal power plants, technological change, institutional economics, production management

References:
  • ACGGF (2019). Global and Russian Energy Outlook. (http://ac.gov.ru/files/publication/a/12767.pdf)
  • Arrow, K. J. (1963). Uncertainty and the welfare Economics of medical care. American Economic Review, 53, 941–973.
  • Bhattacharyya, S. C. (2007). Power sector reform in South Asia: why slow and limited so far? Energy Policy 35, 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.11.028
  • Brożyna, J., Mentel, G., Szetela, B. and Strielkowski, W. (2018). Multi-seasonality in the TBATS model using demand for electric energy as a case study. Economic Computation & Economic Cybernetics Studies & Research, 52(1), 229–246. https://doi.org/10.24818/18423264/52.1.18.14
  • Commons, J. R. (1931). Institutional Economics. American Economic Review, 21, 648–657.
  • EIA (2019). Electricity in the United States. (https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/index.php?page=electricity_in_the_united_states)
  • Erdogdu, E. (2013). A cross-country analysis of electricity market reforms: potential contribution of new Institutional Economics. Energy Economics, 39, 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.05.012
  • Erdogdu, E. (2014). The political economy of electricity market liberalization: a crosscountry
  • approach. The Energy Journal, 91–128. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.35.3.5
  • Furubotn, E. G. and Richter, R. (2005). Institutions and Economic Theory: The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Gratwick, K. N. and Eberhard, A. (2008). Demise of the standard model for power sector reform and the emergence of hybrid power markets. Energy Policy, 36, 3948–3960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.07.021
  • Lisin, E., Rogalev, A., Strielkowski, W. and Komarov, I. (2015). Sustainable modernization of the Russian power utilities industry. Sustainability, 7(9), 11378–11400. https://doi.org/10.3390/su70911378
  • Lisin, E., Shuvalova, D., Volkova, I. and Strielkowski, W. (2018). Sustainable Development of Regional Power Systems and the Consumption of Electric Energy. Sustainability, 10(4), 1111–1121. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041111
  • Lisin, E., Sobolev, A., Strielkowski, W. and Garanin, I. (2016). Thermal efficiency of cogeneration units with multi-stage reheating for Russian municipal heating systems. Energies, 9(4), 269–288. https://doi.org/10.3390/en9040269
  • Lisin, E. and Strielkowski, W. (2014). Modelling new economic approaches for the wholesale energy markets in Russia and the EU. Transformation in Business & Economics, 13 (2B), 566–580
  • Midttun, A. and Piccini, P. B. (2017). Facing the climate and digital challenge: European energy industry from boom to crisis and transformation. Energy Policy, 108, 330–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.046
  • Newbery, D., Pollitt, M. G., Ritz, R. A. and Strielkowski, W. (2018). Market design for a high-renewables European electricity system. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 91, 695–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.025
  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press: New York.
  • North, D. C. (1979). A framework for analyzing the state in economic history. Explorations in Economics History, 16, 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4983(79)90020-2
  • Polemis, M. L. (2016). New evidence on the impact of structural reforms on electricity sector performance. Energy Policy, 92, 420–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.02.032
  • Rausser, G., Strielkowski, W. and Štreimikienė, D. (2018). Smart meters and household electricity consumption: A case study in Ireland. Energy & Environment, 29(1), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X17741385
  • Štreimikienė, D., Strielkowski, W., Bilan, Y. and Mikalauskas, I. (2016). Energy dependency and sustainable regional development in the Baltic states: A review. Geographica Pannonica, 20(2), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.5937/GeoPan1602079S
  • Strielkowski, W. (2016). Entrepreneurship, sustainability, and solar distributed generation. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 4(1), 9–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2016.4.1(1)
  • Strielkowski, W. (2017). Social and economic implications for the smart grids of the future. Economics and Sociology, 10(1), 310–318. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-1/22
  • Strielkowski, W. and Lisin, E. (2016). Optimizing energy contracts for business enterprises and companies. Terra Economicus, 14(2), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2016-14-2-100-109
  • Strielkowski, W., Štreimikienė, D. and Bilan, Y. (2017). Network charging and residential tariffs: A case of household photovoltaics in the United Kingdom. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 77, 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.029
  • Tankha, S., Misal, A. B. and Fuller, B. W. (2010). Getting reforms done in inhospitable institutional environments: untying a Gordian Knot in India’s power distribution sector. Energy Policy, 38, 7121–7129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.07.030
  • Williamson, O. E. (1971). The vertical integration of production: market failure considerations. American Economic Review, 61, 112–123.
  • Williamson, O. E. (1981). The Economics of organization: the transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87, 548–577. https://doi.org/10.1086/227496
  • Williamson, O. E. (1998). The institutions of governance. American Economic Review, 88, 75–79.
Publisher: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Founder: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Online-ISSN: 2412-6039
ISSN: 2076-6297