Pushkinskaya st. 43. office 10
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
344082
e-mail: info@hjournal.ru 
tel. +7(863) 269-88-14

cubsEN (2)

Russian Resource-Extraction Companies: Conservation of Enclaves of Wealth VS. Movement Toward Integrated Economy

Russian Resource-Extraction Companies: Conservation of Enclaves of Wealth VS. Movement Toward Integrated Economy

Journal of Institutional Studies, , Vol. 13 (no. 1),

The article is devoted to the comprehensive assessment of the Russian resource-extraction companies’ readiness for the development of the domestic markets, which is an important condition for the formation of an integrated national economy. Currently, Russian economy development is mainly due to the functioning of the export and raw materials sector. This phenomenon leads to the emergence of enclaves of wealth, which do not have any impact on the development of the rest of the economy, and they are connected through short vertical value chains with global markets of raw materials and low added value commodities. Methodological approaches of the study are represented with the concept of dual enclave economy, the concept of global value chains and the concept of discrete structural alternatives. Annual reports of companies and business groups are the primary sources of data. Apparatus of the theory of fuzzy sets and the algorithm of fuzzy inference of Sugeno-0 order were chosen as research methods. The fulfilled analyses show that State-owned enterprises and companies that affiliated closely with the State are characterized with high level of readiness for the development of domestic markets. At the same time, private resource-extraction companies demonstrate medium and low levels. It is concluded that high level of readiness of State-owned enterprises is linked with the implementation of the «coercion to innovations» public policy. This policy consists in the need for companies with state participation to adopt innovation development programs, which included increasing the budget resources for R&D, implementation of innovation activities and the modernization of industries. Furthermore, companies/business groups with state participation invest significant resources in fulfilling quasi-public obligations to the population in the regions of economic activities. This is one of the conditions to obtain various privileges and benefits provided by the State (for instance, exclusive access to new hydrocarbon deposits). At the same time, the question about «soft» methods to involve Russian resource-extraction companies/business groups into innovation process on the domestic markets is still open.


Keywords: global value chains; export-resource sector; big business; enclaves of wealth; integrated economy

References:
  • Abramov, A., Radygin, A., Chernova, M. (2017). State–Owned Enterprises in the Russian Market: Ownership Structure and their Role in the Economy. Russian Journal of Economics, 3(1), 1–23.
  • Altaf, N., Shah, F. (2018). Ownership Concentration and Firm Performance in Indian Firms: Does Investor Protection Quality Matter? Journal of Indian Business Research, 10(1), 33–52.
  • Andersen, A., Marìn, A., Simensen, E. (2018). Innovation in Natural Resource–Based Industries: a Pathway to Development? Introduction to Special Issue. Innovation and Development, 8(1), 1–27.
  • Aw, B., Chung, S., Roberts, M. (2000). Productivity and Turnover in the Export Market: Micro–level Evidence from the Republic of Korea and Taiwan (China). The World Bank Economic Review,14(1), 65–90.
  • Bachurin, A.I. (2011). Conceptual approach to the formation of a diversity of innovative policies focused on matching supply and demand for innovations. Papers of Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, 3(3), 94–104. (In Russian).
  • Baumol, W.J. (2002). The Free–Market Innovation Machine: Analysing the Growth Miracle of Capitalism. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
  • Bliss, M., Gul, F. (2012). Political Connection and Leverage: Some Malaysian Evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(8), 2344–2350.
  • Bozo, N.V., Shmat, V.V. (2011). Oil and gas «monopole» in Russia. EKO, 10, 74–94. (In Russian).
  • Bradshaw, M., Prendergast, J. (2001). The Russian Heartland Revisited: an Assessment of Russia’s Transformation. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 46(2), 83–122.
  • Brown, R. (2018). Political Activities of Oil & Gas Firms in the United States. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 13(6), 291–300.
  • Bychkova, O. (2016). Innovation by Coercion: Emerging Institutionalisation of University–Industry Collaborations in Russia. Social Studies of Science, 46(4), 511–535.
  • Capobianco, A., Christiansen, H. (2011). Competitive Neutrality and State–Owned Enterprises:Challenges and Policy Options. OECD Corporate Governance Working Papers, 1.
  • Cardoso, F.H., Faletto, E. (1979). Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley, University of California Press.
  • Castells, M. (2000). The Rise of the Network Society. Cambridge, Blackwell Publishers.
  • Chang, D.–Y. (1996). Applications of the Extent Analysis Method on Fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649–655.
  • Chekir, H., Diwan, I. (2014). Crony Capitalism in Egypt. Journal of Globalization and Development,
  • 5(2), 177–211.
  • Chen, C., Li, Y., Lou, D., Zhang, T. (2017). Helping Hands or Grabbing Hands? An Analysis of Political Connections and Firm Value. Journal of Banking and Finance, 80(C), 71–89.
  • Conning, J. Robinson, J. (2009). Enclaves and Development: An Empirical Assessment. Studies in Comparative International Development, 44, 359–385.
  • Cooper, J.M. (2006). Can Russia Compete in the Global Economy? Eurasian Geography and Economics, 47(4), 407–425.
  • Crotty, J. (2016). Corporate Social Responsibility in the Russian Federation: A Contextualised Approach. Business & Society, 55(6), 825–853.
  • Dobrenkov, V.I., Pravnikova, N.R. (2013). The Russian version of «crony capitalism»: is there a way out of the dead end? Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science, 3, 26–55. (In Russian).
  • Engen, O. (2009). The Development of the Norwegian Petroleum Innovation System: A Historical Overview. Innovation, Path Dependency, and Policy: The Norwegian Case, eds. by J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery and B. Verspagen. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 179–208.
  • Evans, P. (1989). Predatory, Developmental, and Other Apparatuses: A Comparative Political Economy Perspective on the Third World State. Sociological Forum, 4(4), 561–587.
  • Faccio, M. (2006). Politically Connected Firms. American Economic Review, 96(1), 369–386.
  • Fisman, R. (2001). Estimating the Value of Political Connections. American Economic Review, 91(4), 1095–1102.
  • Fragmented Space in the Russian Federation (2001). Eds. by B. Ruble, W. Wilson, J. Koehn and N. Popson. Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press.
  • Frye, T. (2002). Capture or Exchange? Business Lobbying in Russia. Europe–Asia Studies, 54(7), 1017–1036.
  • Frye, T. (2004). Credible Commitment and Property Rights: Evidence from Russia. American Political Science Review, 98(3), 453–466.
  • Gallagher, K., Zarsky, L. (2007). The Enclave Economy: Foreign Investment and Sustainable Development in Mexico’s Silicon Valley. Massachusetts, MIT Press.
  • Gelman, V.Ya. (2010). The Logic of «crony capitalism»: big oil, big business and big politics in Russia. Economics and Institutions, ed. by A.P. Zaostrovtsev, St. Petersburg: «Leontief Center», pp. 172–191. (In Russian).
  • Gereffi, G., Sturgeon, T. (2013). Global Value Chains and Industrial Policy: The Role of Emerging Economies. Global Value Chains in a Changing World, eds. by D. K. Elms and P. Low, Geneva: WTO Publications, pp. 329–361.
  • Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., Sturgeon, T. (2005). The Governance of Global Value Chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78–104.
  • Gershman, M.A. (2013). State–owned companies innovation development programs: first results. Foresight, 7(1), 28–43. (In Russian).
  • Goldberg, I., Blanco-Armas, E., Goddard, J.G., Kuriakose, S. (2008). Fostering Knowledge Absorption. Can Russia Compete? eds. by R.M. Desai and I. Goldberg. Washington, Brookings Institution, pp. 35–69.
  • Gonchar, K.R. (2009). Innovative behavior of super–large companies: lazy monopolies or agents of modernization? Preprint WP1/2009/02, Moscow, Publishing house of HSE. (In Russian).
  • Grablowitz, A., Delicado, P., Laget, P. (2007). Business R&D in Europe: Trends in Expenditures, Researchers Numbers and Related Policies. Luxemburg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • Gurvich, E.T. (2017). Knots of the Russian macroeconomic policy. Problems of Theoretical Economics, 1, 40–54. (In Russian).
  • Gustafson, T. (2000). Capitalism Russian–Style. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Hansen, M. (2014). From Enclave to Linkage Economies? A Review of the Literature on Linkages between Extractive Multinational Corporations and Local Industry in Africa. DIIS Working Paper, 02.
  • Hill, F., Gaddy, C. (2003). The Siberian Curse: How Communist Planners Left Russia Out in the Cold. Washington, Brookings Institution Press.
  • Hughes, R., Josephs, T., Karolova, V., Krivenkov, V., Ljungman, G. (2014). Russian Federation: Fiscal Transparency Evaluation. IMF Country Report, 14/134.
  • Johnson, S., Mitton, T. (2003). Cronyism and Capital Controls: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Financial Economics, 67(2), 351–382.
  • Kagan, E.S. (2012). The Use of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy sets theory for estimation complex socio–economic phenomena. Herald of Altai State University, 1–1, 160–163. (In Russian).
  • Kapelyushnikov, R.I. (2008). Property without legitimacy. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 3, 85–105. (In Russian).
  • Keller, W., Yeaple, S. (2009). Multinational Enterprises, International Trade, and Productivity Growth: Firm–Level Evidence from the United States. Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(4), 821–831.
  • Khanna, T., Yafeh, Y. (2007). Business Groups in Emerging Markets: Paragons or Parasites? Journal of Economic Literature, 45(2), 331–372.
  • Khwaja, A.I., Mian, A. (2005). Do Lenders Favor Politically Connected Firms? Rent Provision in an Emerging Financial Market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 4, 1371–1411.
  • Kluge, J. (2019). Mounting Pressure on Russia’s Government Budget: Financial and Political Risks of Stagnation. SWP Research Paper, no. 2.
  • Kohli, A. (1999). Where Do High–Growth Political Economies Come From? The Japanese Lineage of Korea’s «Developmental State». The Developmental State, ed. by M. Woo–Cumings, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, pp. 93–137.
  • Kryukov, V., Tokarev, A. (2019). Contemporary features of innovative development of the Russian mineral resource complex. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 12, 2193–2208.
  • Kurbatova, M.V., Levin, S.N. (2010). Deformalization of rules in the modern Russian economy (example of the interaction of power and business). TERRA ECONOMICUS, 8(1), 27–50. (In Russian).
  • Kurbatova, M.V., Sablin, K.S. (2010). Subjects of development in territorial fragmented institutional environment of the Russian economy. TERRA ECONOMICUS, 8(2), 57–70. (In Russian).
  • Kusznir, J. (2016). Doing Business in Russia: The Main Political Risks and Challenges for International Companies. State Capture, Political Risks and International Business Cases from Black Sea Region Countries, eds. by J. Leitner and H. Meissner, London, Routledge, pp. 89–107.
  • Kuzina, O.E., Chernysheva, M.V. (2015). Corporate charity and responsibility: substantiation of concepts. Monitoring of public opinion: economic and social changes, 4, 154–165. (In Russian).
  • Langlois, R. (2013). Business Groups and the Natural State. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 88, 14–26.
  • Lankina, T. (2009). Regional Developments in Russia: Territorial Fragmentation in a Consolidating Authoritarian State. Social Research, 76(1), 225–256.
  • Lazonick, W. (2005). The Innovative Firm. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Ed. by J. Fagerberg, D.C. Mowery, R.R. Nelson, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 29–56.
  • Levin, S.N. (2014). The markets of power, the regimes of property rights and the political resource of entrepreneurs in modern Russia. Mir Rossii, 23(4), 35–58. (In Russian).
  • Levin, S.N., Kurbatova, M.V. (2011). Network relations of Russian business: business corruption and the organic institute of the real model of the institutional organization of the Russian economy. Journal of Institutional Studies, 3(2), 39–58. (In Russian).
  • Loecker, De J. (2007). Do Exports Generate Higher Productivity? Evidence from Slovenia. Journal of International Economics, 73(1), 69–98.
  • Lynch, A. (2002). Roots of Russia’s Economic Dilemmas: Liberal Economics and Illiberal Geography. Europe–Asia Studies, 54(1), 31–49.
  • Maaloul, A., Chakroun, R., Yahyaoui, S. (2018). The Effect of Political Connections on Companies’ Performance and Value: Evidence from Tunisian Companies after the Revolution. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 8(2), 185–204.
  • Masulis, R.W., Pham, P., Zein, J. (2011). Family Business Groups around the World: Financing Advantages, Control Motivations and Organizational Choices. The Review of Financial Studies, 24(11), 3556–3600.
  • Matysek, A., Fisher, B. (2016). Productivity and Innovation in the Mining Industry,B AE Research Report, 1. National Report on Innovations in Russia (2016). Moscow, Russian Venture Company.
  • Nee, V., Opper, S. (2010). Political Capital in a Market Economy. Social Forces, 88(5), 2105–2132.
  • Nefedkin, V. (2016). The economic power of large corporations and the development of regions. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 3, 99–114. (In Russian).
  • OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard: The Digital Transformation (2017). Paris, OECD Publishing.
  • Pappe, Ya., Antonenko, O. (2011). On new configurations of owners in Russian large business. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 6, 127–137. (In Russian).
  • Pappe, Ya. S., Galukhina, Ya. S. (2009). Russian big business: the First 15 years. Economic chronicles 1993–2008. Moscow, Publishing House of HSE. (In Russian).
  • Pérez, S., Sanchez, C., Martin, D. (2015). Politically Connected Firms in Spain. Business Research Quarterly, 18(4), 230–245.
  • Piegat, A. (2001). Fuzzy modeling and control. Heidelberg, Springer–Verlag Company.
  • Plye, W. (2006). Collection Action and Post–Communist Enterprise: The Economic Logic Russia’s Business Associations. Europe–Asia Studies, 58(4), 491–521.
  • Rugraff, E., Hansen, M. (2011). Multinational Corporations and Local Firms in Emerging Economies: An Introduction. Multinational Corporations and Local Firms in Emerging Economies, eds. by E. Rugraff and M. Hansen. Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press, pp. 13–51.
  • Saeed, A., Belghitar, Y., Clark ,E. (2014). Theoretical Motives of Corporate Cash Holdings and Political Connections: Firms Level Evidence from a Developing Economy. International Review of Applied Economics, 28(6), 813–831.
  • Sato, Y. (2004). The Decline of Conglomerates in Post–Soeharto Indonesia: the Case of Salim Group. Taiwan Journal of Southeast Asia Studies, 1, 19–43.
  • Schoenherr, D. (2019). Political Connections and Allocative Distortions. Journal of Finance, 74(2), 543–586.
  • Sokoloff, K., Engerman, S. (2000). Institutions, Factor Endowments, and Path of Development in the New World. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 217–232.
  • Stiglitz, J. (2003). Globalization and its Discontents. Moscow, National Public and Scientific Fund. (In Russian).
  • Szakonyi, D. (2018). Governing Business: The State and Business in Russia, Philadelphia, Foreign Policy Research Institute.
  • Tambovtsev, V.L. (2003). Informal impact of the State on business. Burden of the State and Economic Policy: Liberal Alternative. Moscow, «Liberal Mission» Fund, pp. 97–100. (In Russian).
  • Volkov, V. (2010). The Problem of credible commitments of property rights and the Russian version of vertical political integration. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 8, 4–27. (In Russian).
  • Warr, P.G. (1989). Export Processing Zones: The Economics of Enclave Manufacturing. The World Bank Research Observer, 4(1), 65–88.
  • Wedeman, A. (2002). Development and Corruption: the East Asian Paradox. Political Business in East Asia, ed. by E.T. Gomez. New York, Routledge, pp. 34–62.
  • Wiig, A., Kolstad, I. (2010). Multinational Corporations and Host Country Institutions: A Case Study of CSR Activities in Angola. International Business Review, 19(2), 178–190.
  • Williamson, O. (1991). Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36 (2), 269–296.
  • Wong, W.–Y., Hooy, C.–W. (2018). Do Types of Political Connection Affect Firm Performance Differently? Pacific–Basin Finance Journal, 51, 297–317.
  • Wu, W., Wu, C., Zhou, C., Wu, J. (2012). Political Connections, Tax Benefits and Firm Performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31 (3), 277–300.
  • Yulianto, T., Komariyah, S., Ulfaniyah, N. (2017). Application of Fuzzy Inference System by Sugeno Method on Estimating of Salt Production. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1, pp. 020039.
  • Zudin, A. (2001). Neocorporatism in Russia? (State and business under Vladimir Putin). Pro et Contra. 6(4), 173–181. (In Russian).
Publisher: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Founder: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Online-ISSN: 2412-6039
ISSN: 2076-6297