Pushkinskaya st. 43. office 10
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
344082
e-mail: info@hjournal.ru 
tel. +7(863) 269-88-14

cubsEN (2)

The Ways to Come Over the Institutional Traps of Higher Education and Science Sphere

The Ways to Come Over the Institutional Traps of Higher Education and Science Sphere

Journal of Institutional Studies, , Vol. 13 (no. 1),

The present paper is devoted to the Russian ineffective higher education and science institutions functioning study and analysis. We consider such institutions to be institutional traps, which are identified as sustainable inefficient rules and practices with the negative impact for education and science sphere reforms and transformations. The lack of the methodology base for regular institutional monitoring is one of the reasonable issues to institutional traps study. Such institutional monitoring should consist of qualitative and quantitative studies to find out the higher education and science sphere representatives points of view on the reforms results. To find out the solution and to improve the research methodology we used in-depth interview surveys and focus group discussions with lecturers and scientists of the Southern Federal University. This methodology let us to improve the institutional traps study and to design the way to come over the difficulties and barriers considering the ideas and experience of the sphere representatives. The responders involved in the present research were suggested by the six following institutional traps to discuss: the metric's trap, the trap of raising level of bureaucracy, the trap of shortage of financing, the quality of education decline trap, the trap of staff capacity and the electronization and digitalization trap.


Keywords: institutional trap; lock-in effect; higher education and science sphere; institutional economics; management approach; educational policy

References:
  • Afonso, A., Schuknecht, L., Tanzi, V. (2005). Public sector efficiency: An international comparison. Public Choice, 123, 321–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-005-7165-2.
  • Arthur, W. B. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. The economic journal, 99(394), 116–131.
  • Bagdasaryan, I.S., Mironova, E.S. (2017). Import of institutions in the Russian economy // Postulate, 2. (In Russian).
  • Baker, R. et al. (2016). Report of the AAPOR Task Force on Non-probability Sampling. Moscow: Public Opinion Foundation. (In Russian).
  • Beazer, W.F. (1966). Expected income changes and the lock-in effect of the capital gains tax. National Tax Journal, 19(3), 308–318.
  • Belokrylova, O.S. (2006). Imperatives of institutionalization of interaction between business and government in local society / Post-Soviet institutionalism – 2006. Power and business. Monograph / Ed. R.M. Nureyev. Rostov n / D: Science-Press, p. 295. (In Russian).
  • Belokrylova, O.S., Zhuk, A.A. (2007). Institutional Transformation of Competitive Environment. Rostov-on-Don: SFedU (In Russian).
  • Chari, V.V., Golosov, M., Tsyvinski, A. (2003). Business start-ups, the lock-in effect, and capital gains taxation. Working paper, University of Minnesota.
  • David, P.A. (1985). Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. The American economic review, 75(2), 332–337.
  • Foxon, T.J. (2002). Technological and institutional ‘lock-in’as a barrier to sustainable innovation. Imperial College Centre for Policy and Technology Working Paper.
  • Graham, L. (2014). Will Russia be able to compete? A history of innovation in tsarist, Soviet and modern Russia. M.: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber. (In Russian).
  • Klein, P. (1998). The capital gain lock-in effect with short sales constraints. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22(12), 1533–1558.
  • Kleiner, G.B. (2005). Institutional Change: Design, Breeding or Prosthetics? / Post-Soviet institutionalism / Ed. R.M. Nureyev, V.V. Dementieva. Donetsk: “Kashtan”, p. 408. (In Russian).
  • Kleiner, G.B. (2005). Modernization of the economy and “growing” institutions: a view “from below” // Access mode: http://kleiner.ru/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/guvsi-2005.pdf – Accessed Date: 05.10.2019). (In Russian).
  • Kurbatova, M.V., Levin, S.N. (2013). Effective contract in the system of higher education in the Russian Federation: theoretical approaches and features of institutional design. Journal of institutional studies (Journal of institutional studies), 5(1), p. 75. (In Russian).
  • Kuzminov, Y., Radaev, V., Yakovlev, A., Yasin, E. (2005). Institutions: from borrowing to growing. Problems of Economics, 5. p. 5. (In Russian).
  • Kvale, S. (2003). Researching interview / S. Kvale. Moscow. (In Russian).
  • Lesnykh, V.V., Popov E.V. (2008). A systematic approach to the problem of import of institutions into the Russian economy. Vestnik USTU-UPI, 2. (In Russian).
  • Malgin, V.A. (2007). Import of institutions and criteria for assessing its effectiveness. Actual problems of economics and law, 11, p. 32 (In Russian).
  • Oleinik, A.N. (2005). Institutional transfer: subjects and constraints (the Russian case in a global context) / Post-Soviet institutionalism / Ed. R.M. Nureyev, V.V. Dementieva. Donetsk: “Kashtan”, p. 434. (In Russian).
  • Pakhomova, N.V., Malyshkov, G.B. (2012). Modernization of Russian environmental legislation and the import of institutions: economic and legal analysis // Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. Series 5: Economics, 3, p. 20–35. (In Russian).
  • Polterovich, V.M. (2001). Transplantation of economic institutions. Economic science of modern Russia, 3, p. 24. (In Russian).
  • Tambovtsev, V.L. (1997). Theoretical issues of institutional design. Economic Issues, 3. (In Russian).
  • Tambovtsev, V.L. (2018). On the scientific substantiation of scientific policy in the Russian Federation. Economics, 2, 5–32. (In Russian).
  • Tsirel, S.V. (2005). “Qwerty-effects”, “path dependence” and Sedov’s law or is it possible to grow stable institutions in Russia. Terra Economicus, 3(3), 44–56. (In Russian).
  • Veblen, T. (2017). The theory of the leisure class. Routledge.
  • Vol’chik, V.V. (2018). The rise of metrics. Tеrrа Economicus, 16(4), (10) (In Russian).
  • Vol’chik, V.V. (2019). Institutional traps in the sphere of education and science under optimization. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoi teorii, 16(4), 783–795 (In Russian).
  • Vol’chik, V.V. Fursa, E.V., Oganesyan, A.A., Krivosheeva-Medyantseva, D.D. (2016). Adaptive behavior and institutions: examining the organization of higher education in Russia. Tеrrа Economicus, 13(2), 127–128 (In Russian).
  • Vol’chik, V.V., Shiriaev, I.M. (2020). Distant higher education under self-isolation and the problem of institutional traps, Economics and national economy management. Actual problems of economics and law, 14(2), 242–243 (In Russian).
  • Vol’chik, V.V. (2004). Neutral markets, non-neutral institutions and economic evolution. Economic Bulletin of Rostov State University, 2(2), . 55 (In Russian).
  • Vol’chik, V.V., Krivosheeva-Medyantseva, D.D. (2016). Reforms in higher education: the role of institutions and social capital. Journal of Institutional Studies, 8(2) (In Russian).
  • Wenting, R., Frenken, K. (2011). Firm entry and institutional lock-in: an organizational ecology analysis of the global fashion design industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(4), 1031–1048.
  • Yamazaki, F. (1996). The lock-in effect of capital gains taxation on land use. Journal of Urban Economics, 39(2), 216–228.
  • Yitzhaki, S. (1979). An empirical test of the lock-in-effect of the capital gains tax. The review of economics and statistics, 626–629.
  • Zhuk A.A., Fursa E.V. (2019). Narrative analysis of institutional traps in the sphere of education and science in Russia. Journal of Institutional Studies (Zhurnal institutsional’nykh issledovanii), 11(1), 176–193 (In Russian).
  • Zhuk A.A. (2011). Failures of the institutional construction of a competitive environment. Economic sciences, 5(78), 48. (In Russian)
Publisher: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Founder: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Online-ISSN: 2412-6039
ISSN: 2076-6297