Pushkinskaya st. 43. office 10
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
344082
e-mail: info@hjournal.ru 
tel. +7(863) 269-88-14

cubsEN (2)

Empirical Analysis of Opportunism Based on Data on University Students of Different Courses

Empirical Analysis of Opportunism Based on Data on University Students of Different Courses

Journal of Institutional Studies, , Vol. 13 (no. 3),

The article is devoted to the New Institutional analysis of the factors of opportunism among students of different courses. The analysis is based on a survey in which 231 students from the Higher School of Economics and other Russian universities took part from February to May 2021. Econometric modeling is based on Latent class analysis, which allows the identification of unobservable groups based on the observed categorical variables presented. One of the main findings of the research is that fourth year students are less prone to opportunism than first, second and third year students. This can be explained by the higher opportunity costs of cheating among fourth year students and their greater independence, primarily financial. In addition, students who are motivated primarily to obtain knowledge (mastery) show a lesser inclination towards opportunism compared with students whose main motive is the degree (performance). Furthermore, a higher level of rationality, both in a general sense and in relation to budget planning, is reflected in a greater tendency to dishonest behavior. Finally, more honest behavior outside the university is combined with more dishonest academic behavior. The latter can be explained by the fact that it is psychologically more difficult to commit an immoral act in relation to a loved one than to do so in an academic environment, when you deceive a not personally familiar person and not even a specific person. Thus, on the basis of the analysis carried out, it can be understood under what conditions the student environment will be characterized by a higher propensity for opportunism and, accordingly, a lower rate of human capital accumulation.


Keywords: opportunism; opportunistic behavior; factors of opportunism; students’ cheating

References:
  • Белянин А.В. (2017). Экономика обмана: причины, факторы, экспериментальное измерение // Экономический журнал ВШЭ 21(2): 201–223. [Belyanin, A.V. (2017). Economics of lies: causes, determinants and experimental measurements. HSE Economic Journal 21(2): 201–223. (In Russian).]
  • Данилова Д.И., Розмаинский И.В. (2019). Эмпирический анализ оппортунизма на основе опроса студентов университетов // Journal of Institutional Studies 11(4): 121–140. [Danilova, D.I., Rozmainsky, I.V. (2019). Empirical analysis of opportunism based on a survey of university students. Journal of Institutional Studies 11(4): 121–140. (In Russian).]
  • Розмаинский И.В., Ивлиева А.А., Ким П.С., Подгайская А.Э. (2017). Институциональный анализ ограниченной рациональности современных россиян // Journal of Institutional Studies 9(4): 101–117. [Rozmainsky, I.V., Ivlieva, A.A., Kim, P.S., Podgayskaya, A.E. (2017). Institutional analysis of bounded rationality of the contemporary Russians. Journal of Institutional Studies 9(4): 101–117. (In Russian).]
  • Уильямсон О.И. (1993). Поведенческие предпосылки современного экономического анализа. // THESIS (3): 39–49. [Williamson, O.E. (1993). Behavioral assumptions of contemporary economic analysis. THESIS (3): 39–49. (In Russian).]
  • Anderman, E.M., Koenka, A.C. (2017). The relation between academic motivation and cheating. Theory Into Practice 56(2): 95–102.
  • Arshad, I., Zahid, H., Umer, S., Khan, S.Y., Sarki, I.H., Yaseen, M.N. (2021). Academic dishonesty among higher education students in Pakistan. Elementary Education Online 20(5): 5334–5345.
  • Baran, L., Jonason, P.K. (2020). Academic dishonesty among university students: The roles of the psychopatht, motivation and self-efficacy. PLoS ONE 15(8), e0238141.
  • Bing, M.N., Davison, H.K., Vitell, S.J., Ammeter, A.P., Garner, B.L., Novicevic, M.M. (2012). An experimental investigation of an interactive model of academic cheating among business school students. Academy of Management Learning & Education 11(1): 28–48.
  • Black, D.B. (1962). The falsification of reported examination marks in a senior university education course. The Journal of Educational Sociology 35(8): 346–354.
  • Borisova, E.I., Peresetsky, A.A. (2016). Do secrets come out? Statistical evaluation of student cheating. Applied Econometrics 44: 119–130.
  • Burrus, R.T., Jones, A.T., Sackley, B., Walker, M. (2013). Itʼs the students, stupid: How perceptions of student reporting impact cheating. The American Economist 58(1): 51–59.
  • Burrus, R.T., McGoldrick, K., Schuhmann, P.W. (2007). Self-reports of student cheating: Does a definition of cheating matter? The Journal of Economic Education 38(1): 3–16.
  • Bushway, A., Nash, W.R. (1977). School cheating behavior. Review of Educational Research 47(4): 623–632.
  • Catacutan, M.R. (2021). Attitudes toward cheating among business students at a private Kenyan university. Journal of International Education in Business 14(1): 20–36.
  • Chala, W.D. (2021). Perceived seriousness of academic cheating behaviors among undergraduate students: an Ethiopian experience. International Journal for Educational Integrity 17(2).
  • Costley, J. (2019). Student perceptions of academic dishonesty at a Cyber-University in South Korea. Journal of Academic Ethics 17(9): 205–217.
  • Danner, F., Anderman, E.M. (2008). Achievement goals and academic cheating. International Review of Social Psychology 21(1-2): 155–180.
  • Denisova-Schmidt, E., Huber, M., Leontyeva, E. (2016). On the development of students’ attitudes towards corruption and cheating in Russian universities. European Journal of Higher Education 6(2): 1–16.
  • Diego, L.A.B. (2017). Friends with benefits: Causes and effects of learners’ cheating practices during examination. IAFOR Journal of Education 5(2): 121–138.
  • Finn, K.V., Frone, M.R. (2004). Academic performance and cheating: Moderating role of school identification and self-efficacy. The Journal of Educational Research 97(3): 115–122.
  • Freiburger, T.L., Romain, D.M., Randol, B.M., Marcum, C.D. (2016). Cheating behaviors among undergraduate college students: Results from a factorial survey. Journal of Criminal Justice Education 28(2): 1–26.
  • Ghanem, C.M., Mozahem, N.A. (2019). A study of cheating beliefs, engagement and perception – The case of business and engineering students. Journal of Academic Ethics 17(2): 291–312.
  • Griebeler, M.C. (2017). Crime and punishment in classroom: A game-theoretic approach for student cheating. Revista Brasileira de Economia 71(1).
  • Hanna, R., Wang, S.-Y. (2017). Dishonesty and selection into public service: Evidence from India. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 9(3): 262–290.
  • Hendy, N.T., Montargot, N. (2019). Understanding Academic dishonesty among business school students in France using the theory of planned behavior. The International Journal of Management Education 17(1): 85–93.
  • Hsiao, C. (2015). Impact of ethical and affective variables on cheating: comparison of undergraduate students with and without jobs. Higher Education 69(1): 55–77.
  • Krou, M.R., Fong, C.J., Hoff, M.A. (2021). Achievement motivation and academic dishonesty: A metaanalytic investigation. Educational Psychology Review 33(2): 427–458.
  • Love, J.H. (2005). On the opportunism-independent theory of the firm. Cambridge Journal of Economics 29(3): 381–397.
  • Love, J.H. (2010). Opportunism, hold-up and the (contractual) theory of the firm. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 166(3): 479–501.
  • Maeda, M. (2021). Exam cheating among Cambodian students: When, how, and why it happens. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 51(3): 337–355.
  • Magnus, J.R., Polterovich, V.M., Danilov, D.L., Savvateev, A.V. (2002). Tolerance of cheating: An analysis across countries. Journal of Economic Education 33(2): 125–135.
  • Miller, A.D., Murdock, T.B., Grotewiel, M. (2017). Addressing academic dishonesty among the highest achievers. Theory Into Practice 56(2): 1–8.
  • Nagin, D.S., Rebitzer, J.R., Sanders, S., Taylor, L.J. (2002). Monitoring, motivation, and management: The determinants of opportunistic behavior in a field experiment. American Economic Review 92(4): 850–873.
  • Peng, S.L., Huang, P.S., Chen, H.C. (2019). Personal achievement goals and the acceptability of cheating in an academic context: The moderating role of academic self-efficacy. Journal of Research in Education Sciences 64(4): 87–113.
  • Ramberg, J., Modin, B. (2019). School effectiveness and student cheating: Do students’ grades and moral standards matter for this relationship? Social Psychology of Education 22(3): 517–538.
  • Rettinger, D.A., Kramer, Y. (2009). Situational and personal causes of student cheating. Research in Higher Education 50(3): 293–313.
  • Smith, K.J., Ervin, D., Davy, J.A. (2003). An examination of the antecedents of cheating among finance students. Journal of Financial Education 29: 13–33.
  • Tas, Y., Tekkaya, C. (2010). Personal and contextual factors associated with students’ cheating in science. The Journal of Experimental Education 78(4): 440–463.
  • Vafaï, K. (2010). Opportunism in organizations. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 26(1): 158–181.
  • Williamson, O.E. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies. Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free Press. 286 p.
  • Zastrow, C.H. (1970). Cheating among college graduate students. The Journal of Educational Research 64(4): 157–160.
Publisher: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Founder: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Online-ISSN: 2412-6039
ISSN: 2076-6297