Pushkinskaya st. 43. office 10
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
344082
e-mail: info@hjournal.ru 
tel. +7(863) 269-88-14

cubsEN (2)

Сoronavirus Pandemic and Expert Knowledge Crisis: Reload of Miracle, Mystery and Authority

Сoronavirus Pandemic and Expert Knowledge Crisis: Reload of Miracle, Mystery and Authority

Journal of Institutional Studies, , Vol. 14 (no. 2),

The article analyzes the reasons for the important effect of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has become the catalyst for long-overdue decline in the authority of expert knowledge. The author claims that widespread access to information and scientific data results in the collapse of universal and monopolistic expert-scientific hierarchies of knowledge of a large society, controlled by the state. Scientific experts, who acted as the historical heirs of priests and shamans, have lost their privileged access to sacred knowledge, made public by the media and the Internet. This resulted in severe damage to the key function of expertise – legitimization of the political order and power elites. Experts without the status of agents of the state have become indistinguishable from ordinary citizens. The example of discussions between Waxers and Anti-Waxers shows that both sides are able to put forward convincing scientific arguments that rhetorically do not allow the authorities to bring the discussion about the effectiveness of vaccinations down to a completely unobvious dispute between enlightened state experts and uneducated obscurantists. It is in the most developed Western states where one can see a strong civil dissident movement that distrusts or calls into question the disciplinary regimes of collective coexistence, legitimized by the paternalistic rhetoric of concern from political elites. Accordingly, the elites in the background situation of strengthening the practices of heterarchy, post-truth and postmodernism can no longer rely on the usual metanarratives of the Enlightenment, which allowed them to monopolize the discourse of science in the name of progress and unconditional good, building hierarchies of knowledge-power convenient for their priorities. Since science, knowledge and information have long became public domain, the line between elites, experts and citizens in the field of access to science has become almost indistinguishable. The actual political problem is that the situation of collision of different paradigms, opinions and data is exactly the normal state of science, which is now transferred to the field of public discussions following the final secularization of science. Thus, the institution of expert knowledge turns into an unnecessary link in a situation of equal access of all interested parties to scientific data; to an institution that hardly would efficiently perform the functions of scientific legitimation of socially significant decisions in the foreseeable future.


Keywords: COVID-19; coronavirus; pandemic; expertise; expert knowledge; post-truth; postmodern; authority; legitimation; paternalism

References:
  • Бессонова О.Э. (2019). Гражданские жалобы как демократический механизм обратной связи. Социологические исследования (1): 63–74. [Bessonova, O.E. (2019). Civil Complaints as a Democratic Feedback Formism. Sociological studies (1): 63–74. (in Russian).]
  • Брауз С. (2020). Между правдой, искренностью и сатирой: политика постправды и риторика аутентичности //Метамодернизм. Историчность, Аффект и Глубина после постмодернизма / Р. ван ден Аккер: [пер. с англ. В.М. Липки; вступит. ст. А.В. Павлова]. М.: РИПОЛ классик. [Browse, S. (2020). Browse S. Between Truth, Sincerity and Satire: Post-Truth Politics and the Rhetoric of Authenticity. Metamodernism: Historicity, Affect, and Depth After Postmodernism / R. van den Acker: [trans. from English V.M. Lipki; will enter. Art. A.V. Pavlova]. M.: RIPOL classic. (in Russian).]
  • Вакцинация от коронавируса: отношение россиян (2021). ВЦИОМ (https://wciom.ru/analyticalreviews/analiticheskii-obzor/vakcinacija-ot-koronavirusa-otnoshenie-rossijan?ysclid=l3d0c1ztue – Дата обращения 16.05.2022) [Vaccination against coronavirus: the attitude of Russians (2021). VTsIOM (https://wciom.ru/analytical-reviews/analiticheskii-obzor/vakcinacija-ot-koronavirusaotnoshenie-rossijan?ysclid=l3d0c1ztue – Access Date: 16.05.2022) (in Russian).]
  • Вачедин Д. (2021). В Германии ковид-диссиденты проводят митинги, дерутся с полицией и участвуют в выборах. «Медуза» выяснила, как устроено их движение – и почему в нем очень любят русскоязычных. Данное сообщение (материал) создано и (или) распространено иностранным средством массовой информации, выполняющим функции иностранного агента, и (или) российским юридическим лицом, выполняющим функции иностранного агента.(https://meduza.io/feature/2021/08/19/v-germanii-kovid-dissidenty-provodyatmitingi-derutsya-s-politsiey-i-uchastvuyut-v-vyborah-meduza-vyyasnila-kak-ustroeno-ih-dvizheniei-pochemu-v-nem-ochen-lyubyat-russkoyazychnyh– Дата обращения 27.09.2021) [Vachedin, D. (2021). In Germany, Covid dissidents hold rallies, fight the police and participate in elections. Meduza found out how their movement works - and why Russian speakers are very fond of it (https://meduza.io/feature/2021/08/19/v-germanii-kovid-dissidenty-provodyat-mitingi-derutsya-s-politsieyi-uchastvuyut-v-vyborah-meduza-vyyasnila-kak-ustroeno-ih-dvizhenie-i-pochemu-v-nem-ochenlyubyat-russkoyazychnyh – Access Date: 09.27.2021) (in Russian).]
  • Иноземцев В. (2019). Конец эпохи. Что идет на смену противостоянию науки и религии в обществе XXI века (https://snob.ru/entry/184764/–Дата обращения 27.09.2021) [Inozemtsev V. (2019). End of an era. What is replacing the confrontation between science and religion in society of the XXI century (https://snob.ru/entry/184764 – Access Date: 09.27.2021) (in Russian).]
  • Левинсон А. (2021). Власть и народ – на социальной дистанции- (https://novayagazeta.ru/articles/2021/09/01/vlast-i-narod-na-sotsialnoi-distantsii – Дата обращения: 27.09.2021) [Levinson A. (2021). Power and people – at a social distance- (https://novayagazeta.ru/articles/2021/09/01/vlast-i-narod-na-sotsialnoi-distantsii – Access Date: 09.27.2021) (in Russian).]
  • Мартьянов В.С. (2016). Социальная стратификация современных обществ: от экономических классов к рентным группам? Социологические исследования (10): 139–148. [Martyanov V.S. (2016). Social stratification of modern societies: from economic classes to rental groups? Sociological studies (10): 139–148. (in Russian).]
  • Мединский В.Р. (2011). Проблемы объективности в освещении российской истории второй половины ХV–ХVІІ вв. Специальность – 07.00.02 – Отечественная история. Автореферат диссертации на соискание ученой степени доктора исторических наук. Москва. [Medinsky, V.R. (2011). Problems of objectivity in the coverage of Russian history in the second half of the XV–XVII centuries. Specialty – 07.00.02 – National History. Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Historical Sciences. Moscow. (in Russian).]
  • Ортега-и-Гассет Х. (2001). Восстание масс. М.: АСТ. [Ortega y Gasset, H. (2001) The Revolt of the Masses. Moscow: AST. (in Russian).]
  • Статистика вакцинации от коронавируса (2022). (https://gogov.ru/articles/covid-v-stats –Дата обращения 18.05.2022) [Coronavirus vaccination statistics (2022). (https://gogov.ru/articles/covid-v-stats – Access Date: 18.05.2022) (in Russian).]
  • Тощенко Ж.Т. (2020). Общество травмы: между эволюцией и революцией (опыт теоретического и эмпирического анализа). М.: Весь Мир. [Toshchenko, Z.T. (2020). Trauma Society: Between Evolution and Revolution (The Experience of Theoretical and Empirical Analysis). Moscow: Ves Mir. (in Russian).]
  • Фишман Л.Г. (2018). Жертва и рента. Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология (44): 94–102. [(in Russian).]
  • Фишман Л.Г., Мартьянов, В.С., Давыдов, Д.А. (2019). Рентное общество: в тени труда, капитала и демократии. М.: Высшая школа экономики. [(in Russian).]
  • Фишман Л.Г. (2020). Посткапитализм и последняя (анти)утопия нашего времени. Полития (2): 40–53. [Fishman L.G. (2020). Post-capitalism and last (dys)topia of our time. Polity (2): 40–53. (in Russian).]
  • Фуллер С. (2021). Постправда: Знание как борьба за власть. М.: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики. [Fuller, S. (2021). Post-Truth. Knowledge as a Power Game. Moscow: Ed. house of the Higher School of Economics. (in Russian).]
  • Compton, J, van der Linden, S, Cook, J, Basol, M. (2021). Inoculation theory in the post-truth era: Extant findings and new frontiers for contested science, misinformation, and conspiracy theories. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2021;15:e12602. (https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12602 – Access Date: 27.09.2021)
  • Nichols, T. (2017). The Death of Expertise. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Pluckrose, H., Lindsay, J. (2020). Cynical Theories: How Activist Scholarship Made Everything about Race, Gender, and Identity ― and Why This Harms Everybody. Durham: Pitchstone Publishing.
  • Solís Arce, J.S., Warren, S.S., Meriggi, N.F. et al. (2021). COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy in low- and middle-income countries // Nat Med. (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01454-y – Access Date: 27.09.2021)
  • Shelton, T. (2020). A post-truth pandemic? Big Data & Society. July–December.
  • Zafesova, A. (2020). The production of a faked reality as an existential function of Putin’s regime. Democracy and Fake News: Information Manipulation and Post-Truth Politics. London: Routledge.
Publisher: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Founder: Ltd. "Humanitarian perspectives"
Online-ISSN: 2412-6039
ISSN: 2076-6297